> On 11 Dec 2021, at 18:09, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> * config/vxworks.h (VXWORKS_OS_CPP_BUILTINS): Define
> _C99 for C++.
>
> Makes sense?
>
> Yes. I can't approve patches outside libstdc++, but that looks definitely
> correct for C++11 and later, because C++11 incorporate
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021, 10:56 Olivier Hainque via Libstdc++, <
libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> (Thanks for your feedback Jonathan)
>
> > On 10 Dec 2021, at 19:24, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > I'm curious why _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_CTYPE_TR1 is not defined if VxWorks
> > has isblank, the configure check
(Thanks for your feedback Jonathan)
> On 10 Dec 2021, at 19:24, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> I'm curious why _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_CTYPE_TR1 is not defined if VxWorks
> has isblank, the configure check is:
Oh, hmm, very good point. The reason was that the definition
of isblank is conditioned on _C99/_
On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 at 17:07, Olivier Hainque via Libstdc++
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The attached patch helps fix a build failure of libstdc++
> on some variants of VxWorks where the system headers expose
> an "isblank" macro.
>
> I understand this kind of thing normally is handled through
> fixinclu
Hello,
The attached patch helps fix a build failure of libstdc++
on some variants of VxWorks where the system headers expose
an "isblank" macro.
I understand this kind of thing normally is handled through
fixincludes, however fixincludes on VxWorks is very tricky and
we already have
libstdc++-
