On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 10:05:17AM -0500, Luis Machado wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 08/08/2018 04:54 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> > On 08/01/2018 04:23 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 01:10:34PM -0500, Luis Machado wrote:
> >>> The adjusted vector costs give Falkor a reasonable
Hi,
On 08/08/2018 04:54 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
On 08/01/2018 04:23 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 01:10:34PM -0500, Luis Machado wrote:
The adjusted vector costs give Falkor a reasonable boost in
performance for FP
benchmarks (both CPU2017 and CPU2006) and doesn't
On 08/01/2018 04:23 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 01:10:34PM -0500, Luis Machado wrote:
The adjusted vector costs give Falkor a reasonable boost in performance for FP
benchmarks (both CPU2017 and CPU2006) and doesn't change INT benchmarks that
much. About 0.7% for CPU2017
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 01:10:34PM -0500, Luis Machado wrote:
> The adjusted vector costs give Falkor a reasonable boost in performance for FP
> benchmarks (both CPU2017 and CPU2006) and doesn't change INT benchmarks that
> much. About 0.7% for CPU2017 FP and 1.54% for CPU2006 FP.
>
> OK for
Hi Kyrill,
On 07/26/2018 11:34 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Luis,
On 25/07/18 19:10, Luis Machado wrote:
The adjusted vector costs give Falkor a reasonable boost in
performance for FP
benchmarks (both CPU2017 and CPU2006) and doesn't change INT
benchmarks that
much. About 0.7% for CPU2017
Hi Luis,
On 25/07/18 19:10, Luis Machado wrote:
The adjusted vector costs give Falkor a reasonable boost in performance for FP
benchmarks (both CPU2017 and CPU2006) and doesn't change INT benchmarks that
much. About 0.7% for CPU2017 FP and 1.54% for CPU2006 FP.
OK for trunk?
The patch looks
The adjusted vector costs give Falkor a reasonable boost in performance for FP
benchmarks (both CPU2017 and CPU2006) and doesn't change INT benchmarks that
much. About 0.7% for CPU2017 FP and 1.54% for CPU2006 FP.
OK for trunk?
gcc/ChangeLog:
2018-07-25 Luis Machado
*
