Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Add support for the Samsung Exynos M1 processor

2015-04-06 Thread Sebastian Pop
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote: On April 4, 2015 5:03:14 AM GMT+02:00, Sebastian Pop seb...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:09 PM, James Greenhalgh james.greenha...@arm.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 07:53:12PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan

Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Add support for the Samsung Exynos M1 processor

2015-04-04 Thread Richard Biener
On April 4, 2015 5:03:14 AM GMT+02:00, Sebastian Pop seb...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:09 PM, James Greenhalgh james.greenha...@arm.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 07:53:12PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Sebastian Pop seb...@gmail.com

Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Add support for the Samsung Exynos M1 processor

2015-04-03 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Sebastian Pop seb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:51 PM, James Greenhalgh james.greenha...@arm.com wrote: Trunk is currently in Stage 4 development, these patches are fairly low-risk, but they are certainly not regression fixes. I'll defer to

Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Add support for the Samsung Exynos M1 processor

2015-04-03 Thread Sebastian Pop
Hi, On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:51 PM, James Greenhalgh james.greenha...@arm.com wrote: Trunk is currently in Stage 4 development, these patches are fairly low-risk, but they are certainly not regression fixes. I'll defer to port maintainers and release managers for the final say, but in my

Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Add support for the Samsung Exynos M1 processor

2015-04-03 Thread James Greenhalgh
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 07:53:12PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Sebastian Pop seb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:51 PM, James Greenhalgh james.greenha...@arm.com wrote: Trunk is currently in Stage 4 development, these patches are

Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Add support for the Samsung Exynos M1 processor

2015-04-03 Thread Sebastian Pop
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:09 PM, James Greenhalgh james.greenha...@arm.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 07:53:12PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Sebastian Pop seb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:51 PM, James Greenhalgh

Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Add support for the Samsung Exynos M1 processor

2015-04-02 Thread Sebastian Pop
Message- From: Kyrill Tkachov [mailto:kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 3:33 To: Evandro Menezes; 'GCC Patches' Subject: Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Add support for the Samsung Exynos M1 processor Hi Evandro On 30/03/15 22:51, Evandro Menezes wrote: The Samsung Exynos M1

Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Add support for the Samsung Exynos M1 processor

2015-04-02 Thread James Greenhalgh
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 11:19:14PM +0100, Sebastian Pop wrote: Hi, from what I understand, Evandro has addressed the comments from Kyrill. Are there other problems to be addressed before the patches can go in? Trunk is currently in Stage 4 development, these patches are fairly low-risk, but

Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Add support for the Samsung Exynos M1 processor

2015-03-31 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
Hi Evandro On 30/03/15 22:51, Evandro Menezes wrote: The Samsung Exynos M1 implements the ARMv8 ISA and this patch adds support for it through the -mcpu command-line option. The patch was checked on arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf without new failures. OK for trunk? -- Evandro Menezes Austin, TX

RE: [PATCH] [ARM] Add support for the Samsung Exynos M1 processor

2015-03-31 Thread Evandro Menezes
Austin, TX -Original Message- From: Kyrill Tkachov [mailto:kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 3:33 To: Evandro Menezes; 'GCC Patches' Subject: Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Add support for the Samsung Exynos M1 processor Hi Evandro On 30/03/15 22:51

[PATCH] [ARM] Add support for the Samsung Exynos M1 processor

2015-03-30 Thread Evandro Menezes
The Samsung Exynos M1 implements the ARMv8 ISA and this patch adds support for it through the -mcpu command-line option. The patch was checked on arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf without new failures. OK for trunk? -- Evandro Menezes Austin, TX