> -Original Message-
> From: Gcc-patches bounces+kyrylo.tkachov=arm@gcc.gnu.org> On Behalf Of Alexandre
> Oliva via Gcc-patches
> Sent: Friday, March 3, 2023 8:24 AM
> To: Christophe Lyon
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [arm] adjust
On 3/3/23 09:24, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Hello, Christophe,
On Feb 22, 2023, Christophe Lyon wrote:
OK thanks for the clarification.
(and for the other cleanup patches!)
Was this meant as approval? I hadn't taken it as such.
Unfortunately, no, I don't have such powers :-)
Hello, Christophe,
On Feb 22, 2023, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> OK thanks for the clarification.
> (and for the other cleanup patches!)
Was this meant as approval? I hadn't taken it as such.
Otherwise, please consider this a ping :-)
On 2/22/23 13:38, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Hello, Christophe,
On Feb 20, 2023, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 2/17/23 08:17, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches wrote:
Back when quotes were added around "+cdecp" in the "coproc must be
a constant immediate" error in arm-builtins.cc, tests for that
Hello, Christophe,
On Feb 20, 2023, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 2/17/23 08:17, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>
>> Back when quotes were added around "+cdecp" in the "coproc must be
>> a constant immediate" error in arm-builtins.cc, tests for that message
>> lagged behind. Fixed
Hi Alexandre,
On 2/17/23 08:17, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches wrote:
Back when quotes were added around "+cdecp" in the "coproc must be
a constant immediate" error in arm-builtins.cc, tests for that message
lagged behind. Fixed thusly.
Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Tested on
Back when quotes were added around "+cdecp" in the "coproc must be
a constant immediate" error in arm-builtins.cc, tests for that message
lagged behind. Fixed thusly.
Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Tested on arm-vxworks7 (gcc-12) and arm-eabi (trunk). Ok to install?
for
