Re: [PATCH] [gomp4] Initial support of OpenACC loop directive in C front-end.

2014-11-12 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Tue, 5 Aug 2014 08:22:50 -0700, Cesar Philippidis ce...@codesourcery.com wrote: On 07/29/2014 02:07 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:42:48 +0100, I wrote: On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:50:44 +0100, I wrote: On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:37:24 +0400, Ilmir Usmanov

Re: [PATCH] [gomp4] Initial support of OpenACC loop directive in C front-end.

2014-08-05 Thread Cesar Philippidis
On 07/29/2014 02:07 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:42:48 +0100, I wrote: On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:50:44 +0100, I wrote: On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:37:24 +0400, Ilmir Usmanov i.usma...@samsung.com wrote: This patch introduces support of OpenACC loop directive (and combined

Re: [PATCH] [gomp4] Initial support of OpenACC loop directive in C front-end.

2014-07-29 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi Cesar! On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:42:48 +0100, I wrote: On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:50:44 +0100, I wrote: On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:37:24 +0400, Ilmir Usmanov i.usma...@samsung.com wrote: This patch introduces support of OpenACC loop directive (and combined directives) in C front-end up to

Re: [PATCH] [gomp4] Initial support of OpenACC loop directive in C front-end.

2014-07-24 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:42:48 +0100, I wrote: On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:50:44 +0100, I wrote: On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:37:24 +0400, Ilmir Usmanov i.usma...@samsung.com wrote: This patch introduces support of OpenACC loop directive (and combined directives) in C front-end up to GENERIC.

Re: [PATCH] [gomp4] Initial support of OpenACC loop directive in C front-end.

2014-03-20 Thread Ilmir Usmanov
Hi Thomas! On 19.03.2014 23:35, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Do you intend to support loop constructs that are not nested in a parallel or kernels construct? As I'm reading it, the specification is not clear on this. (I guess I'll raise this question with the OpenACC guys.) Yes, I do. There are

Re: [PATCH] [gomp4] Initial support of OpenACC loop directive in C front-end.

2014-03-20 Thread Tobias Burnus
Ilmir Usmanov wrote: On 19.03.2014 23:35, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Do you intend to support loop constructs that are not nested in a parallel or kernels construct? As I'm reading it, the specification is not clear on this. (I guess I'll raise this question with the OpenACC guys.) Yes, I

Re: [PATCH] [gomp4] Initial support of OpenACC loop directive in C front-end.

2014-03-20 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi Ilmir! On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:37:24 +0400, Ilmir Usmanov i.usma...@samsung.com wrote: This patch introduces support of OpenACC loop directive (and combined directives) in C front-end up to GENERIC. Currently no clause is allowed. --- /dev/null +++

Re: [PATCH] [gomp4] Initial support of OpenACC loop directive in C front-end.

2014-03-20 Thread Ilmir Usmanov
Hi Thomas! On 20.03.2014 14:21, Thomas Schwinge wrote: I just realized that this is wrong usage of the dg-excess-errors directive, for this one will absorb *all* remaining errors, whereas you just wanted to mask out any »sorry, unimplemented: directive not yet implemented« ones. Sorry for

Re: [PATCH] [gomp4] Initial support of OpenACC loop directive in C front-end.

2014-03-20 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 03:42:48PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Here are the patches, committed in r208702..4 to gomp-4_0-branch. Jakub, are the first two fine for trunk, or shall I wait until stage 1? Stage1 IMHO. Jakub

Re: [PATCH] [gomp4] Initial support of OpenACC loop directive in C front-end.

2014-03-20 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:27:20AM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote: 3) GCC OpenMP implementation supports loop construct without parallel. It is not about GCC OpenMP implementation, it is the standard that requires it. If you have an orphaned #pragma omp for e.g., you still can call the containing

Re: [PATCH] [gomp4] Initial support of OpenACC loop directive in C front-end.

2014-03-19 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi Ilmir! On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:37:24 +0400, Ilmir Usmanov i.usma...@samsung.com wrote: This patch introduces support of OpenACC loop directive (and combined directives) in C front-end up to GENERIC. Currently no clause is allowed. --- /dev/null +++

[PATCH] [gomp4] Initial support of OpenACC loop directive in C front-end.

2014-03-18 Thread Ilmir Usmanov
Hi Thomas! This patch introduces support of OpenACC loop directive (and combined directives) in C front-end up to GENERIC. Currently no clause is allowed. This patch is necessary to finish implementation of OpenACC 1.0 in fortran front-end. As you know, OpenACC fortran implementation does

Re: [PATCH] [gomp4] Initial support of OpenACC loop directive in C front-end.

2014-03-18 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:37:24 +0400, Ilmir Usmanov i.usma...@samsung.com wrote: This patch introduces support of OpenACC loop directive (and combined directives) in C front-end up to GENERIC. Currently no clause is allowed. Thanks! I had worked on a simpler patch, not yet dealing with

Re: [PATCH] [gomp4] Initial support of OpenACC loop directive in C front-end.

2014-03-18 Thread Ilmir Usmanov
Committed as r208649. -- Ilmir.