Jeff Law wrote:
>It's been so long since I did anything with our web pages, I'm not
>entirely sure of proper procedures anymore.
>
>Gerald, this look OK?
Basically. ;-)
Per http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html, should it be "run time"?
And add a at the end if the item.
If anything else n
On 01/01/14 04:28, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 14:41:01 -0600
Jeff Law wrote:
Here's the final patch to remove mudflap. Per the multiple
recommendations, it leaves the options as nops and warns for them.
Can you write something about this for changes.html?
It's been so long since I
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013 14:41:01 -0600
Jeff Law wrote:
> Here's the final patch to remove mudflap. Per the multiple
> recommendations, it leaves the options as nops and warns for them.
Can you write something about this for changes.html?
--
Ryan Hillpsn: dirtyepic_sk
g
On Oct 28, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/26/13 15:08, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> As far as I can see, the commit left empty libmudflap directories around
>> rather than removing them (SVN, unlike git, allows empty directories to be
>> represented in the repository).
> I'll check out an
> On Oct 28, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>> On 10/26/13 15:08, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> As far as I can see, the commit left empty libmudflap directories around
>> rather than removing them (SVN, unlike git, allows empty directories to be
>> represented in the repository).
> I'll chec
On 10/26/13 15:08, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
As far as I can see, the commit left empty libmudflap directories around
rather than removing them (SVN, unlike git, allows empty directories to be
represented in the repository).
I'll check out an SVN tree and remove the empty directory.
jeff
As far as I can see, the commit left empty libmudflap directories around
rather than removing them (SVN, unlike git, allows empty directories to be
represented in the repository).
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
