On 05/08/2015 05:27 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 05/07/2015 08:42 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
There has been some debate over the strength requirement of barriers for
Curse you for the BZ reference. I read maybe the first 75%, then
glossed over 15%, then read the last bit in detail. Hard to do near
On 05/07/2015 08:42 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
There has been some debate over the strength requirement of barriers for
__sync operations... This is documented within the PR.
Originally __sync was suppose to be synonymous with SEQ_CST, but there
has been a slight slackening of the barrier-ness of
There has been some debate over the strength requirement of barriers for
__sync operations... This is documented within the PR.
Originally __sync was suppose to be synonymous with SEQ_CST, but there
has been a slight slackening of the barrier-ness of SEQ_CST from the
language lawyers. Under so
