Ping?
thanks,
Cong
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Cong Hou wrote:
> Thank you for reminding me the omp possibility. Yes, in this case my
> pattern is incorrect, because I assume all aliases will be resolved by
> alias checks, which may not be true with omp.
>
> LOOP_VINFO_NO_DATA_DEPENDENCIE
Thank you for reminding me the omp possibility. Yes, in this case my
pattern is incorrect, because I assume all aliases will be resolved by
alias checks, which may not be true with omp.
LOOP_VINFO_NO_DATA_DEPENDENCIES or LOOP_REQUIRES_VERSIONING_FOR_ALIAS
may not help here because vect_pattern_rec
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 05:32:54PM -0700, Cong Hou wrote:
> In this patch a new reload-rewrite pattern detector is composed to
> handle the following pattern in the loop being vectorized:
>
>x = *p;
>...
>y = *p;
>
>or
>
>*p = x;
>...
>y = *p;
>
> In both cases, *p i
In this patch a new reload-rewrite pattern detector is composed to
handle the following pattern in the loop being vectorized:
x = *p;
...
y = *p;
or
*p = x;
...
y = *p;
In both cases, *p is reloaded because there may exist other defs to
another memref that may alias with p.
