On 6/1/21 5:35 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
My initial reaction is 'that can't be right'.
How would -mfp16-format=alternative ever work in this case?
You are right. I'm going to revert the hunk done
in g:ebd5e86c0f41dc1d692f9b2b68a510b1f6835a3e
Martin
>From
> Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 3:06 PM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Christophe Lyon ; Tamar Christina
> ; Kyrylo Tkachov
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: reset arm_fp16_format
>
> Hello.
>
> The patch fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98636#c20
> where
On 01/06/2021 15:05, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
The patch fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98636#c20
where
target option restore can be called and arm_fp16_format should be reset
to ARM_FP16_FORMAT_NONE.
It fixes the ICE in the PR.
Can please ARM folks test me the patch
Hello.
The patch fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98636#c20 where
target option restore can be called and arm_fp16_format should be reset
to ARM_FP16_FORMAT_NONE.
It fixes the ICE in the PR.
Can please ARM folks test me the patch on a Arm machine?
Thanks,
Martin
