On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:27:46PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > +funknown-commons
> > +Common Var(flag_unknown_commons)
> > +Assume common declarations may be overridden with unknown larger sizes
>
> I think to make it work with LTO you need to mark it 'Optimization'.
> Also it's about
>
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
> On 22/02/16 12:03, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> (f) A global command-line option, which we check alongside DECL_COMMON and
>> further tests (basically, we want only DECL_COMMON decls that either have
>> ARRAY_TYPE, or some
On 25/02/16 18:00, Alan Lawrence wrote:
On 22/02/16 12:03, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
(f) A global command-line option, which we check alongside DECL_COMMON and
further tests (basically, we want only DECL_COMMON decls that either have
ARRAY_TYPE, or some other aggregate type with flexible array
On 22/02/16 12:03, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> (f) A global command-line option, which we check alongside DECL_COMMON and
> further tests (basically, we want only DECL_COMMON decls that either have
> ARRAY_TYPE, or some other aggregate type with flexible array member or some
> other trailing array in
On 22/02/16 12:03, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
(f) A global command-line option, which we check alongside DECL_COMMON and
further tests (basically, we want only DECL_COMMON decls that either have
ARRAY_TYPE, or some other aggregate type with flexible array member or some
other trailing array in the
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:46:19AM +, Alan Lawrence wrote:
> On 19/02/16 17:52, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 05:42:34PM +, Alan Lawrence wrote:
> >>This relates to FORTRAN code where different modules give different sizes
> >>to the
> >>same array in a COMMON block
On 19/02/16 17:52, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 05:42:34PM +, Alan Lawrence wrote:
This relates to FORTRAN code where different modules give different sizes to the
same array in a COMMON block (contrary to the fortran language specification).
SPEC have refused to patch the
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 05:42:34PM +, Alan Lawrence wrote:
> This relates to FORTRAN code where different modules give different sizes to
> the
> same array in a COMMON block (contrary to the fortran language specification).
> SPEC have refused to patch the source code
>
This relates to FORTRAN code where different modules give different sizes to the
same array in a COMMON block (contrary to the fortran language specification).
SPEC have refused to patch the source code
(https://www.spec.org/cpu2006/Docs/faq.html#Run.05).
Hence, this patch provides a