On 2023-09-20 08:29, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I just noticed (ENOCOFFEE) that the line (after removing libvtv) is:
Support libraries such as libiberty, libcc1 and libcpp have been
developed separately to share code with other tools such as binutils
and gdb.
Does that address your
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 08:23:32AM -0400, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> On 2023-09-20 07:58, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> > On 2023-09-20 07:55, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 07:50:43AM -0400, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> > > > + Support libraries such as libiberty, libcc1
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 07:58:04AM -0400, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> On 2023-09-20 07:55, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 07:50:43AM -0400, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> > > +Support libraries such as libiberty, libcc1 libvtv and libcpp have
> >
> > Missing comma before
On 2023-09-20 07:58, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
On 2023-09-20 07:55, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 07:50:43AM -0400, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
+ Support libraries such as libiberty, libcc1 libvtv and libcpp have
Missing comma before libvtv. But more importantly, libvtv is
On 2023-09-20 07:55, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 07:50:43AM -0400, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
+Support libraries such as libiberty, libcc1 libvtv and libcpp have
Missing comma before libvtv. But more importantly, libvtv is not
support library like libiberty, libcpp, it is
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 07:50:43AM -0400, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> +Support libraries such as libiberty, libcc1 libvtv and libcpp have
Missing comma before libvtv. But more importantly, libvtv is not
support library like libiberty, libcpp, it is more like the sanitizer
libraries runtime
Define a security process and exclusions to security issues for GCC and
all components it ships.
Signed-off-by: Siddhesh Poyarekar
---
Sending as a proper patch since there have been no further comments on
the RFC. I toyed with the idea of making the distinction of
"exploitable vulnerability"
