t; > -Original Message-
> > From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org On
> > Behalf Of Christophe Lyon
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 2:18 PM
> > To: Christophe Lyon ; Martin Sebor
> > ; gcc Patches ; Richard Earnshaw
> > ; ni...@redhat.com; Jozef La
tin Sebor
> ; gcc Patches ; Richard Earnshaw
> ; ni...@redhat.com; Jozef Lawrynowicz
> ; Richard Sandiford
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add generic support for "noinit" attribute
>
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 14:14, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry for
; gcc Patches ; Richard Earnshaw
; ni...@redhat.com; Jozef Lawrynowicz
; Richard Sandiford
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add generic support for "noinit" attribute
On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 14:14, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Sorry for the slow response, I'd missed that there was
On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 14:14, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Sorry for the slow response, I'd missed that there was an updated patch...
>
> Christophe Lyon writes:
> > 2019-07-04 Christophe Lyon
> >
> > * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_noinit): New
> > proc.
> >
Sorry for the slow response, I'd missed that there was an updated patch...
Christophe Lyon writes:
> 2019-07-04 Christophe Lyon
>
> * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_noinit): New
> proc.
> * gcc.c-torture/execute/noinit-attribute.c: New test.
Ping?
On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 15:35, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the useful feedback.
>
>
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 11:54, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for doing this in a generic way.
> >
> > Christophe Lyon writes:
> > > @@ -2224,6 +2234,50 @@
Hi,
On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 15:35:23 +0200
Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the useful feedback.
>
>
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 11:54, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for doing this in a generic way.
> >
> > Christophe Lyon writes:
> > > @@ -2224,6 +2234,50 @@
Hi,
Thanks for the useful feedback.
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 11:54, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Thanks for doing this in a generic way.
>
> Christophe Lyon writes:
> > @@ -2224,6 +2234,50 @@ handle_weak_attribute (tree *node, tree name,
> >return NULL_TREE;
> > }
> >
> > +/* Handle a
Thanks for doing this in a generic way.
Christophe Lyon writes:
> @@ -2224,6 +2234,50 @@ handle_weak_attribute (tree *node, tree name,
>return NULL_TREE;
> }
>
> +/* Handle a "noinit" attribute; arguments as in struct
> + attribute_spec.handler. Check whether the attribute is allowed
>
Ping?
Le mar. 9 juil. 2019 à 00:04, Martin Sebor a écrit :
> On 7/8/19 5:10 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > On Sat, 6 Jul 2019 at 19:57, Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7/4/19 9:27 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Similar to what already exists for TI msp430 or in TI compilers
On 7/8/19 5:10 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jul 2019 at 19:57, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 7/4/19 9:27 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi,
Similar to what already exists for TI msp430 or in TI compilers for
arm, this patch adds support for the "noinit" attribute.
It is convenient for
On Sat, 6 Jul 2019 at 19:57, Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 7/4/19 9:27 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Similar to what already exists for TI msp430 or in TI compilers for
> > arm, this patch adds support for the "noinit" attribute.
> >
> > It is convenient for embedded targets where the
On 7/4/19 9:27 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi,
Similar to what already exists for TI msp430 or in TI compilers for
arm, this patch adds support for the "noinit" attribute.
It is convenient for embedded targets where the user wants to keep the
value of some data when the program is restarted:
On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 at 12:57, Jozef Lawrynowicz wrote:
>
> On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 11:26:20 +0200
> Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at 23:46, Jozef Lawrynowicz
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Also, the gcc.target/arm/noinit-attribute.c test works with msp430.
> > > Why not create a
On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 11:26:20 +0200
Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at 23:46, Jozef Lawrynowicz
> wrote:
> >
> > Also, the gcc.target/arm/noinit-attribute.c test works with msp430.
> > Why not create a effective-target keyword which checks for noinit support,
> > so
> > the test can
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at 23:46, Jozef Lawrynowicz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/msp430/msp430.c b/gcc/config/msp430/msp430.c
> > index 365e9eb..8266fa0 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/msp430/msp430.c
> > +++ b/gcc/config/msp430/msp430.c
> > @@ -1807,7 +1807,6 @@ const char * const
Hi,
> diff --git a/gcc/config/msp430/msp430.c b/gcc/config/msp430/msp430.c
> index 365e9eb..8266fa0 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/msp430/msp430.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/msp430/msp430.c
> @@ -1807,7 +1807,6 @@ const char * const ATTR_CRIT = "critical";
> const char * const ATTR_LOWER = "lower";
>
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 17:27:28 +0200
Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Finally, I tested on arm-eabi, but not on msp430 for which I do not
> have the environment, so advice from msp430 maintainers is
> appreciated. Since msp430 does not use the same default helpers as
> arm, I left the "noinit" handling
Hi,
Similar to what already exists for TI msp430 or in TI compilers for
arm, this patch adds support for the "noinit" attribute.
It is convenient for embedded targets where the user wants to keep the
value of some data when the program is restarted: such variables are
not zero-initialized. It is
19 matches
Mail list logo
