On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 10:51:23PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/diagnostic.c b/gcc/diagnostic.c
index 0cc7593..67b8c5b 100644
--- a/gcc/diagnostic.c
+++ b/gcc/diagnostic.c
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/diagnostic.c b/gcc/diagnostic.c
index 0cc7593..67b8c5b 100644
--- a/gcc/diagnostic.c
+++ b/gcc/diagnostic.c
@@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ diagnostic_action_after_output (diagnostic_context
*context,
real_abort ();
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 10:51:23PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/diagnostic.c b/gcc/diagnostic.c
index 0cc7593..67b8c5b 100644
--- a/gcc/diagnostic.c
+++ b/gcc/diagnostic.c
@@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ diagnostic_action_after_output
Ping.
-Maxim
On 08/28/2014 11:31 AM, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
Ping. Add Joseph S. Myers as driver maintainer.
-Maxim
Original Message
Subject: Fwd: [PATCH] Add patch for debugging compiler ICEs.
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 17:57:51 +0400
From: Maxim Ostapenko m.ostape
Ping. Add Joseph S. Myers as driver maintainer.
-Maxim
Original Message
Subject:Fwd: [PATCH] Add patch for debugging compiler ICEs.
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 17:57:51 +0400
From: Maxim Ostapenko m.ostape...@partner.samsung.com
To: Jeff Law l...@redhat.com, GCC
Ping.
-Maxim
Original Message
Subject:[PATCH] Add patch for debugging compiler ICEs.
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 21:03:22 +0400
From: Maxim Ostapenko m.ostape...@partner.samsung.com
To: GCC Patches gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
CC: Jeff Law l...@redhat.com, Jakub Jelinek
Ping.
-Maxim
Original Message
Subject:[PATCH] Add patch for debugging compiler ICEs.
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 21:03:22 +0400
From: Maxim Ostapenko m.ostape...@partner.samsung.com
To: GCC Patches gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
CC: Jeff Law l...@redhat.com, Jakub Jelinek
Hi,
A years ago there was a discussion
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-01/msg02437.html) about
debugging compiler ICEs that resulted in a patch from Jakub, which dumps
useful information into temporary file, but for some reasons this patch
wasn't applied to trunk.
This is the
Greenhalgh james.greenha...@arm.com
Cc: Max Ostapenko, GCC Patches, Yury Gribov, Viacheslav Garbuzov, Trevor
Saunders, Maxim Ostapenko
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add patch for debugging compiler ICEs
On 07/04/2014 07:21 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 04:13:31PM +0100, James Greenhalgh
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:21:14PM +0100, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
Hi,
A years ago there was a discussion
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-01/msg02437.html) about debugging
compiler ICEs that resulted in a patch from Jakub, which dumps
useful information into temporary file, but for
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 04:13:31PM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:21:14PM +0100, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
Hi,
A years ago there was a discussion
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-01/msg02437.html) about debugging
compiler ICEs that resulted in a patch
This is the resurrected patch with added GCC version information
into generated repro file.
I wonder whether we should also set ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE and
ADDR_COMPAT_LAYOUT in addition to -frandom-seed (according to
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Randomization).
-Y
Hi,
A years ago there was a discussion
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-01/msg02437.html) about debugging
compiler ICEs that resulted in a patch from Jakub, which dumps
useful information into temporary file, but for some reasons this patch wasn't
applied to trunk.
This is the
13 matches
Mail list logo
