On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 16:20 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 14:48 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
I remember having this discussion, and I was looking for it to check
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 13:40 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
snip
Hmm. I don't like this patch or its general idea too much. Instead
I'd like us to move more of the cost model detail to the
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 13:49 -0500, William J. Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 13:40 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
snip
Hmm. I don't like this patch or its general idea too much.
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 12:08 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 13:40 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
snip
Hmm. I don't like this patch or its general idea too much.
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 12:08 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 13:40 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
snip
Hmm.
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 12:10 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 13:49 -0500, William J. Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 13:40 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
snip
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 12:10 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 13:49 -0500, William J. Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 13:40 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 14:48 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
I remember having this discussion, and I was looking for it to check on
the details, but I can't seem to find it either in my inbox or in the
archives. Can you please point me to
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 14:48 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
I remember having this discussion, and I was looking for it to check on
the details, but I can't seem to find it either in my inbox
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 13:40 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
snip
Hmm. I don't like this patch or its general idea too much. Instead
I'd like us to move more of the cost model detail to the target, giving
it a chance to look at the whole loop
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 13:49 -0500, William J. Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 13:40 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
snip
Hmm. I don't like this patch or its general idea too much. Instead
I'd like us to move more of the cost model
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
This patch adds a heuristic to the vectorizer when estimating the
minimum profitable number of iterations. The heuristic is
target-dependent, and is currently disabled for all targets except
PowerPC. However, the intent is to make it general
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 13:40 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
This patch adds a heuristic to the vectorizer when estimating the
minimum profitable number of iterations. The heuristic is
target-dependent, and is currently disabled for all targets
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 13:40 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
This patch adds a heuristic to the vectorizer when estimating the
minimum profitable number of iterations. The heuristic is
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Hmm. I don't like this patch or its general idea too much. Instead
I'd like us to move more of the cost model detail to the target, giving
it a chance to look at the
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Hmm. I don't like this patch or its general idea too much. Instead
I'd like us to move more of
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
wrote:
Hmm. I don't like this patch or its general
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 13:40 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
This patch adds a heuristic to the vectorizer when estimating the
minimum
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Well, they are at least magic numbers and heuristics that apply
generally and not only to the single issue in sphinx. And in
fact how it works for sphinx _is_ magic.
Second, I suggest that you need to rephrase I can
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 16:58 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 13:40 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
This patch adds a
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 11:09 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Well, they are at least magic numbers and heuristics that apply
generally and not only to the single issue in sphinx. And in
fact how it works for sphinx
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:38 PM, William J. Schmidt
wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 11:09 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Well, they are at least magic numbers and heuristics that apply
22 matches
Mail list logo
