On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 1:57 PM Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 7:11 AM liuhongt wrote:
> >
> > RA sometimes will use lowest the cost of the mode with all different
> > regclasses
> > w/o check if it's hard_regno_mode_ok.
> > It's impossible to put modes whose size > 8 into
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 7:11 AM liuhongt wrote:
>
> RA sometimes will use lowest the cost of the mode with all different
> regclasses
> w/o check if it's hard_regno_mode_ok.
> It's impossible to put modes whose size > 8 into MASK_REGS, ajdust the cost to
> avoid potential performance issue.
I
RA sometimes will use lowest the cost of the mode with all different regclasses
w/o check if it's hard_regno_mode_ok.
It's impossible to put modes whose size > 8 into MASK_REGS, ajdust the cost to
avoid potential performance issue.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu{-m32,}.
Ok for
