On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Changelog:
* expmed.c (store_bit_field_1): Fix wordnum value for big endian targets
The author line was missing so I put:
2012-03-27 Aurelien Buhrig aurelien.buhrig@gmail.com
PR middle-end/51893
* expmed.c
Changelog:
* expmed.c (store_bit_field_1): Fix wordnum value for big endian targets
The author line was missing so I put:
2012-03-27 Aurelien Buhrig aurelien.buhrig@gmail.com
PR middle-end/51893
* expmed.c (store_bit_field_1): Fix wordnum value for big-endian
Passes bootstrap and regression test powerpc64-linux.
Thanks a lot, Alan!
So, Aurelien, you only need to adjust the formatting of the patch and post a
ChangeLog entry along with it. TIA.
Thanks Alan!
Bootstrap and regression test for m68k-elf ok, but I have trouble cross
compiling
Passes bootstrap and regression test powerpc64-linux.
Thanks a lot, Alan!
So, Aurelien, you only need to adjust the formatting of the patch and post a
ChangeLog entry along with it. TIA.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:53:07PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
This patch (for 4.6) fixes a wrong subword index computation in
store_bit_field_1 for big endian targets when value is at least 4 times
bigger than a word (DI REG value with HI words).
It fixes a regression on
Hi,
This patch (for 4.6) fixes a wrong subword index computation in
store_bit_field_1 for big endian targets when value is at least 4 times
bigger than a word (DI REG value with HI words).
It fixes a regression on gcc.c-torture/execute/bitfld-3.c for my current
backend port.
This patch (for 4.6) fixes a wrong subword index computation in
store_bit_field_1 for big endian targets when value is at least 4 times
bigger than a word (DI REG value with HI words).
It fixes a regression on gcc.c-torture/execute/bitfld-3.c for my current
backend port.