thanks.
David
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Sharad Singhai sing...@google.com wrote:
Committed documentation as r206161. Sorry about the delay.
Thanks,
Sharad
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:18:05AM -0700, Sharad
Committed documentation as r206161. Sorry about the delay.
Thanks,
Sharad
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:18:05AM -0700, Sharad Singhai wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
On Tue,
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:18:05AM -0700, Sharad Singhai wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 09:22:02AM -0700, Sharad Singhai wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com
wrote:
On Tue,
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Sharad Singhai sing...@google.com wrote:
Found the issue. The stream was incorrectly being closed when it was
stderr/stdout. So only the dump output before the first dump_finish
call
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Sharad Singhai sing...@google.com wrote:
Found the issue. The stream was incorrectly being closed when it was
stderr/stdout. So only the dump output before the first dump_finish
call was being emitted to stderr. I fixed this the same way the
alt_dump_file was
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Except that in this form, the dump will be extremely large and not
suitable for very large applications.
So? You asked for it and you can easily grep the output before storing it
away.
Besides, we might also want to
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Except that in this form, the dump will be extremely large and not
suitable for very large applications.
Yes. I did some measurements for
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Xinliang David Li
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
Besides, we might also want to
use the same machinery (dump_printf_loc etc) for dump file dumping.
The current behavior of using '-details' to turn on opt-info-all
messages for dump files are not desirable.
On 30 August 2013 23:23:16 Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 August 2013 23:23:16 Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Teresa Johnson
Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com writes:
Index: testsuite/gcc.dg/inline-dump.c
===
--- testsuite/gcc.dg/inline-dump.c (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/gcc.dg/inline-dump.c (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* Verify that
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
New patch below that removes this global variable, and also outputs
the node-symbol.order (in square brackets after the function name so
Sorry, I should not have committed that new test along with this
portion of the patch. Removed as of r202106.
Teresa
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com writes:
Index: testsuite/gcc.dg/inline-dump.c
Except that in this form, the dump will be extremely large and not
suitable for very large applications. Besides, we might also want to
use the same machinery (dump_printf_loc etc) for dump file dumping.
The current behavior of using '-details' to turn on opt-info-all
messages for dump files are
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Except that in this form, the dump will be extremely large and not
suitable for very large applications.
Yes. I did some measurements for both a fairly large source file that
is heavily optimized with LIPO and for a
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Except that in this form, the dump will be extremely large and not
suitable for very large applications.
Yes. I did some measurements for
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com
wrote:
Except that in this form, the dump will be extremely large and
Besides, we might also want to
use the same machinery (dump_printf_loc etc) for dump file dumping.
The current behavior of using '-details' to turn on opt-info-all
messages for dump files are not desirable.
Interestingly, this doesn't even work. When I do
-fdump-ipa-inline-details=stderr
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Teresa Johnson
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Teresa Johnson
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Teresa Johnson
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Does
'make newlines consitent' avoid all the spurious vertical spacing I see
with
-fopt-info?
Well, it helps get us there. The problem was that before, since
dump_loc was not consistently emitting newlines,
Ok.
Richard.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Richard Biener
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
New patch below that removes this global variable, and also outputs
the node-symbol.order (in square brackets after the function name so
as to not clutter it). Inline messages with profile data look look:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
The inline stuff should be split and re-sent, it's non-obvious to me (extra
function parameters are not documented for example). I'd rather have
inline_and_report_call () for example instead of an extra bool parameter.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:14:42AM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
On
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Teresa Johnson
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Teresa Johnson
Ping #3.
Thanks,
Teresa
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
Ping.
Thanks,
Teresa
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6,
+ Honza
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
Ping #3.
Thanks,
Teresa
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
Ping.
Thanks,
Teresa
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On
Ping.
Thanks,
Teresa
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Martin Jambor
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:14:42AM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
On
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:37:00PM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
This patch ports messages to the new dump framework,
It would be great this new framework was documented somewhere. I lost
track of what was agreed it would be and from the uses in the
vectorizer I was never quite sure how to
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:37:00PM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
This patch ports messages to the new dump framework,
It would be great this new framework was documented somewhere. I lost
track of what was agreed it
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:37:00PM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
This patch ports messages to the new dump framework,
It would be great this new framework was documented somewhere. I lost
track of what was agreed it
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:14:42AM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:37:00PM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
This patch ports messages to the new dump framework,
It would be great this new
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:37:00PM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
This patch ports messages to the new dump framework,
It would be great this
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:14:42AM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:37:00PM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
This patch ports
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 09:22:02AM -0700, Sharad Singhai wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:37:00PM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
This patch
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 09:22:02AM -0700, Sharad Singhai wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
On
yes -- if this is the place developers look at the most.
David
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Sharad Singhai sing...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 09:22:02AM -0700, Sharad Singhai wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:14:42AM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz wrote:
On Mon,
This patch ports messages to the new dump framework, specifically those
involving missing/mismatched/corrupted profile data, indirect call
promotions performed, and inlines. For the inline messages, I ported
Dehao's patch from the google branches that enables printing call chain
information.
I
45 matches
Mail list logo
