Re: [PATCH] Decrease integer-share-limit

2012-08-17 Thread Richard Guenther
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:44:03PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Paolo Carlini wrote: On 08/16/2012 03:39 PM, Richard Guenther wrote: This decreases the integer-share-limit to make sure the TREE_VEC we allocate for the

[PATCH] Decrease integer-share-limit

2012-08-16 Thread Richard Guenther
This decreases the integer-share-limit to make sure the TREE_VEC we allocate for the small cached integers has a reasonable size for our GC memory allocator. With the current value (256) and a reduced testcase from PR54146 we see tree.c:1224 (build_int_cst_wide) 40:

Re: [PATCH] Decrease integer-share-limit

2012-08-16 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, On 08/16/2012 03:39 PM, Richard Guenther wrote: This decreases the integer-share-limit to make sure the TREE_VEC we allocate for the small cached integers has a reasonable size for our GC memory allocator. Out of curiosity (just in case you hav two spare minutes) do you have any idea why

Re: [PATCH] Decrease integer-share-limit

2012-08-16 Thread Richard Guenther
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Paolo Carlini wrote: Hi, On 08/16/2012 03:39 PM, Richard Guenther wrote: This decreases the integer-share-limit to make sure the TREE_VEC we allocate for the small cached integers has a reasonable size for our GC memory allocator. Out of curiosity (just in case you

Re: [PATCH] Decrease integer-share-limit

2012-08-16 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:44:03PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Paolo Carlini wrote: On 08/16/2012 03:39 PM, Richard Guenther wrote: This decreases the integer-share-limit to make sure the TREE_VEC we allocate for the small cached integers has a reasonable size for