On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:44:03PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 08/16/2012 03:39 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
This decreases the integer-share-limit to make sure the TREE_VEC we
allocate for the
This decreases the integer-share-limit to make sure the TREE_VEC we
allocate for the small cached integers has a reasonable size for
our GC memory allocator. With the current value (256) and a reduced
testcase from PR54146 we see
tree.c:1224 (build_int_cst_wide) 40:
Hi,
On 08/16/2012 03:39 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
This decreases the integer-share-limit to make sure the TREE_VEC we
allocate for the small cached integers has a reasonable size for
our GC memory allocator.
Out of curiosity (just in case you hav two spare minutes) do you have
any idea why
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 08/16/2012 03:39 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
This decreases the integer-share-limit to make sure the TREE_VEC we
allocate for the small cached integers has a reasonable size for
our GC memory allocator.
Out of curiosity (just in case you
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:44:03PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 08/16/2012 03:39 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
This decreases the integer-share-limit to make sure the TREE_VEC we
allocate for the small cached integers has a reasonable size for