On Nov 23, 2015, at 3:13 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2015, David Malcolm wrote:
>
>> Is there (or could there be) a precanned dg- directive to ask if ObjC is
>> available?
>
> I don't think so. Normal practice is that each language's tests are in
> appropriate directories for th
On 11/23/2015 12:50 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 10:25 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/23/2015 04:13 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2015, David Malcolm wrote:
Is there (or could there be) a precanned dg- directive to ask if ObjC is
available?
I don't think so. Normal
o objc.sum.
OK for trunk?
>From f09c48b2ac55b2f9b5c3688e76fb4b91c3325fbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Malcolm
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:12:47 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Fix PR objc/68438 (uninitialized source ranges)
gcc/c/ChangeLog:
PR objc/68438
* c-parser.c (c_parser_postfix_express
On 11/23/2015 04:13 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2015, David Malcolm wrote:
Is there (or could there be) a precanned dg- directive to ask if ObjC is
available?
I don't think so. Normal practice is that each language's tests are in
appropriate directories for that language, with run
On Sun, 22 Nov 2015, David Malcolm wrote:
> Is there (or could there be) a precanned dg- directive to ask if ObjC is
> available?
I don't think so. Normal practice is that each language's tests are in
appropriate directories for that language, with runtest never called with
a --tool option f
On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 23:28 +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> > The source ranges are verified using the same unit-testing plugin used
> > for C expressions. This leads to a wart, which is that it means having
> > a .m test file lurking below gcc.dg/plugin
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, David Malcolm wrote:
> The source ranges are verified using the same unit-testing plugin used
> for C expressions. This leads to a wart, which is that it means having
> a .m test file lurking below gcc.dg/plugin. A workaround would be to
> create an objc.dg/plugin subdirecto
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu; adds 15 PASS results to
gcc.sum.
OK for trunk?
>From afdae8b15f71164d0d05e790078519b38bd674a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Malcolm
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:12:47 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Fix PR objc/68438 (uninitialized source ranges)
gcc/c/ChangeLog:
PR objc/68438