Re: [PATCH] Fix PR53031

2012-04-22 Thread H.J. Lu
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote: This fixes PR53031 and reverts back to using the number of latch iterations in VRP when computing ranges for induction variables. Now after ira_allocno_object_iter_cond is fixed this no longer breaks bootstrap.

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR53031

2012-04-22 Thread H.J. Lu
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 3:43 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote: This fixes PR53031 and reverts back to using the number of latch iterations in VRP when computing ranges for induction variables. Now after

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR53031

2012-04-22 Thread H.J. Lu
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 10:14 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote: This fixes PR53031 and reverts back to using the number of latch iterations in VRP when computing ranges for induction variables. Now after

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR53031

2012-04-21 Thread H.J. Lu
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote: This fixes PR53031 and reverts back to using the number of latch iterations in VRP when computing ranges for induction variables. Now after ira_allocno_object_iter_cond is fixed this no longer breaks bootstrap.

[PATCH] Fix PR53031

2012-04-19 Thread Richard Guenther
This fixes PR53031 and reverts back to using the number of latch iterations in VRP when computing ranges for induction variables. Now after ira_allocno_object_iter_cond is fixed this no longer breaks bootstrap. Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress. Richard. 2012-04-19