On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Iain Sandoe wrote:
On 19 Jun 2012, at 22:41, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jun 19, 2012, at 12:22 PM, Iain Sandoe i...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 19 Jun 2012, at 13:53, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
Richard Guenther
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de writes:
We are too eager to bump alignment of some decls when vectorizing.
The fix is to not bump alignment of decls the user explicitely
aligned or
Hi,
On 20 Jun 2012, at 09:23, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Iain Sandoe wrote:
On 19 Jun 2012, at 22:41, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jun 19, 2012, at 12:22 PM, Iain Sandoe i...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 19 Jun 2012, at 13:53, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012,
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Hi,
On 20 Jun 2012, at 09:23, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Iain Sandoe wrote:
On 19 Jun 2012, at 22:41, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jun 19, 2012, at 12:22 PM, Iain
We are too eager to bump alignment of some decls when vectorizing.
The fix is to not bump alignment of decls the user explicitely
aligned or that are used in an unknown way.
Bootstrapped and tested on i686-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10
and powerpc-apple-darwin9 by darwin folks, applied.
Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de writes:
We are too eager to bump alignment of some decls when vectorizing.
The fix is to not bump alignment of decls the user explicitely
aligned or that are used in an unknown way.
I thought attribute((__aligned__)) only set a minimum alignment
for
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de writes:
We are too eager to bump alignment of some decls when vectorizing.
The fix is to not bump alignment of decls the user explicitely
aligned or that are used in an unknown way.
I thought
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de writes:
We are too eager to bump alignment of some decls when vectorizing.
The fix is to not bump alignment of decls the user explicitely
aligned or that are used in an unknown way.
I thought
On 19 Jun 2012, at 13:53, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de writes:
We are too eager to bump alignment of some decls when vectorizing.
The fix is to not bump alignment of decls the user explicitely
aligned or that
On Jun 19, 2012, at 12:22 PM, Iain Sandoe i...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 19 Jun 2012, at 13:53, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de writes:
We are too eager to bump alignment of some decls when vectorizing.
The fix is
On Jun 19, 2012, at 5:53 AM, domi...@lps.ens.fr (Dominique Dhumieres) wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de writes:
We are too eager to bump alignment of some decls when vectorizing.
The fix is to not bump alignment of decls the user
On 19 Jun 2012, at 22:41, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jun 19, 2012, at 12:22 PM, Iain Sandoe i...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 19 Jun 2012, at 13:53, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de writes:
We are too eager to bump
12 matches
Mail list logo
