Hi Eric,
>> So it failed before Toms original patch. Please add sparc-solaris
>> to the list of XFAILed targets.
>
> SPARC/Linux is affected too so sparc*-*-* instead.
actually, it's sparc*-*-* && lp64 only. Done like this after testing on
sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and i386-pc-solaris2.11.
> So it failed before Toms original patch. Please add sparc-solaris
> to the list of XFAILed targets.
SPARC/Linux is affected too so sparc*-*-* instead.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> > On 03/19/2018 10:11 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 03/16/2018 12:55 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
>
> > On 02/27/2018 01:42 PM, Richa
Hi Tom,
> On 03/19/2018 10:11 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/16/2018 12:55 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 02/27/2018 01:42 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ss
On 03/19/2018 10:11 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 03/16/2018 12:55 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 02/27/2018 01:42 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 03/16/2018 12:55 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
> >
> > > On 02/27/2018 01:42 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c
> > > >
On 03/16/2018 12:55 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 02/27/2018 01:42 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c
===
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 02/27/2018 01:42 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c
> > ===
> > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c (nonexistent)
> > +++ gcc/testsuite/gc
On 02/27/2018 01:42 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c
===
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c (nonexistent)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr84512.c (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,
With Honzas change to make the x86 backend consider the actual operation
for costing vector stmts it becomes apparent that
vect_compute_single_scalar_iteration_cost uses the old-style target
cost hook which doesn't get enough information to distinguish different
operations. This means instead of
10 matches
Mail list logo