On 11/09/2012 12:12 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
Hi,
I found that some test cases access arrays beyond their bounds. I
looked up their originating bugzillas and found that the test
cases for pr22506 and pr34005 were likely to be typos since the
original test cases in the report do not have
On Fri, 09 Nov 2012 11:57:44 -0700, Jeff wrote:
The off-by-one aspects of 31227 ought to be corrected.
Ok for the trunk,
I don't have write access (not sure if I qualify for it yet with just a
couple of trivial patches so far) so I need someone to commit for me.
Thanks,
Siddhesh
On 11/09/2012 12:14 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2012 11:57:44 -0700, Jeff wrote:
The off-by-one aspects of 31227 ought to be corrected.
Ok for the trunk,
I don't have write access (not sure if I qualify for it yet with just a
couple of trivial patches so far) so I need
Hi,
I found that some test cases access arrays beyond their bounds. I
looked up their originating bugzillas and found that the test
cases for pr22506 and pr34005 were likely to be typos since the
original test cases in the report do not have this problem. For
pr31227 however, I am inclined to
