Sendinggcc/ChangeLog
Sendinggcc/config/arm/thumb1.md
Transmitting file data ..
Committed revision 213710.
P.S. Sorry for inconvenience.
On 08/07/2014 01:02 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
Sorry ;( Will test&fix it.
On 08/07/2014 12:50 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 08/06/2014 06:44 P
Sorry ;( Will test&fix it.
On 08/07/2014 12:50 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 08/06/2014 06:44 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
Similarly for the movqi pattern.
You haven't updated the thumb1 QImode pattern in the same way.
R.
On 07/08/14 09:10, Marat Zakirov wrote:
--Marat
On 08/07/2014 12:00
>>> On 08/06/2014 06:44 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
Similarly for the movqi pattern.
You haven't updated the thumb1 QImode pattern in the same way.
R.
On 07/08/14 09:10, Marat Zakirov wrote:
> --Marat
> On 08/07/2014 12:00 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 8:36 AM,
--Marat
On 08/07/2014 12:00 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
Thank you.
$ svn commit
Sendinggcc/ChangeLog
Sendinggcc/config/arm/thumb1.md
Sendinggcc/config/arm/thumb2.md
Transmitting file data ...
Committed revision 21
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> $ svn commit
> Sendinggcc/ChangeLog
> Sendinggcc/config/arm/thumb1.md
> Sendinggcc/config/arm/thumb2.md
> Transmitting file data ...
> Committed revision 213695.
>
> P.S.
>
> Minor nit was reg. tested.
A
Thank you.
$ svn commit
Sendinggcc/ChangeLog
Sendinggcc/config/arm/thumb1.md
Sendinggcc/config/arm/thumb2.md
Transmitting file data ...
Committed revision 213695.
P.S.
Minor nit was reg. tested.
On 08/06/2014 06:44 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 06/08/14 15:14, Ramana
On 06/08/14 15:14, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>
> This is OK thanks.
>
>
> Ramana
>
Hmm, minor nit.
(define_insn "*thumb1_movhi_insn"
[(set (match_operand:HI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=l,l,m,*r,*h,l")
- (match_operand:HI 1 "general_operand" "l,m,l,*h,*r,I"))]
+ (mat
This is OK thanks.
Ramana
On 07/30/2014 04:56 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
On 07/23/2014 05:33 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
Hi all!
This is a friendly reminder message.
On 07/17/2014 03:22 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
On 07/16/2014 01:32 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 16/07/14 10:22, Marat Zakirov wrote:
Christophe,
Please loo
On 07/23/2014 05:33 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
Hi all!
This is a friendly reminder message.
On 07/17/2014 03:22 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
On 07/16/2014 01:32 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 16/07/14 10:22, Marat Zakirov wrote:
Christophe,
Please look at a new patch. Draft tests are OK.
I'll as
Hi all!
This is a friendly reminder message.
On 07/17/2014 03:22 PM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
On 07/16/2014 01:32 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 16/07/14 10:22, Marat Zakirov wrote:
Christophe,
Please look at a new patch. Draft tests are OK.
I'll ask your commit approval when full regression (A
On 07/16/2014 01:32 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 16/07/14 10:22, Marat Zakirov wrote:
Christophe,
Please look at a new patch. Draft tests are OK.
I'll ask your commit approval when full regression (ARM/thumb1/thumb2)
tests are done.
Hi Marat,
I was about to propose the thumb2.md hunk mysel
Thank to you all.
Committed revision 212450.
--Marat
Original Message
Subject:Re: [PING][PATCH] Fix for PR 61561
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 14:01:24 +0100
From: Ramana Radhakrishnan
To: Marat Zakirov , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org"
CC: Richard Earns
gured
--with-thumb or when forcing -mthumb.
Christophe.
On 11 July 2014 11:08, Marat Zakirov wrote:
Thank to you all.
Committed revision 212450.
--Marat
Original Message
Subject:Re: [PING][PATCH] Fix for PR 61561
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 14:01:24 +0100
From: R
t; Thank to you all.
>>>
>>> Committed revision 212450.
>>>
>>> --Marat
>>>
>>>
>>> Original Message
>>> Subject:Re: [PING][PATCH] Fix for PR 61561
>>> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 14:01:24 +
-with-thumb or when forcing -mthumb.
Christophe.
On 11 July 2014 11:08, Marat Zakirov wrote:
Thank to you all.
Committed revision 212450.
--Marat
Original Message
Subject:Re: [PING][PATCH] Fix for PR 61561
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 14:01:24 +0100
From: R
ct: Re: [PING][PATCH] Fix for PR 61561
> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 14:01:24 +0100
> From: Ramana Radhakrishnan
> To: Marat Zakirov , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org"
>
> CC: Richard Earnshaw , Kyrylo Tkachov
> , Slava Garbuzov , Yuri
> Gribov , "mara...
On 19/06/14 21:19, Yuri Gribov wrote:
>> Thirdly, we also need to fix movhi_bytes (for pre-v4) thumb2_movhi_insn
>> (for thumb2) and, quite possibly, thumb1_movhi_insn (for thumb1). There
>> may well be additional changes for movqi variants as well.
>
> A general question: how should one test ARM
Thank to you all.
Committed revision 212450.
--Marat
Original Message
Subject:Re: [PING][PATCH] Fix for PR 61561
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 14:01:24 +0100
From: Ramana Radhakrishnan
To: Marat Zakirov , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org"
CC: Richard Earnsha
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Yuri Gribov wrote:
>> Thirdly, we also need to fix movhi_bytes (for pre-v4) thumb2_movhi_insn
>> (for thumb2) and, quite possibly, thumb1_movhi_insn (for thumb1). There
>> may well be additional changes for movqi variants as well.
>
> A general question: how shoul
On 30/06/14 16:21, Marat Zakirov wrote:
Thank for your attention.
This is OK for trunk - Sorry about the delayed response.
Ramana
Marat.
Original Message
Subject:[PING][PATCH] Fix for PR 61561
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 19:21:49 +0400
From: Marat Zakirov
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
CC: Ramana Radhakrishnan , Richard
Earnshaw , Kyrill Tkachov
, Slava Garbuzov , Yuri
Gribov , mara...@gmail.com
This is a reminder message on fix for PR 61561 which is ICE while
compiling something which is valid* 'C' code.
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61561).
Ramana, Richard, I am very appreciated for your attention and error
indication, your work made my patch simple and tiny. And I h
Hi all,
Here's my new patch for PR 61561
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61561).
Which fixes ICE appeared due to QI/HI pattern lack in arm.md for stack
pointer register.
Reg. tested on arm-v7.
--Marat
arm.diff
Description: Binary data
> Thirdly, we also need to fix movhi_bytes (for pre-v4) thumb2_movhi_insn
> (for thumb2) and, quite possibly, thumb1_movhi_insn (for thumb1). There
> may well be additional changes for movqi variants as well.
A general question: how should one test ARM backend patches? Is it
enough to regtest ARM
On 19/06/14 16:12, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 19/06/14 16:05, Marat Zakirov wrote:
Hi all,
Here's a patch for PR 61561
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61561).
It fixes ICE.
Thanks for your contribution.
However, this is *really* not the way to submit a patch and is the sort
On 19/06/14 16:05, Marat Zakirov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's a patch for PR 61561
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61561).
>
> It fixes ICE.
>
> Reg. tested on arm15.
>
> --Marat
>
>
> arm.md.diff.diff
>
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2014-06-19 Marat Zakirov
>
> * config
> + (if_then_else (match_operand 1 "const_int_operand"
> "")
> +(const_string "mov_imm" )
> +(const_string "mov_reg"))])]
Why not just mov_reg?
> * config/arm/arm.md: New templates see pr6156
On 19/06/14 16:05, Marat Zakirov wrote:
Hi all,
Here's a patch for PR 61561
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61561).
It fixes ICE.
Reg. tested on arm15.
CC'ing the arm maintainers...
Kyrill
--Marat
Hi all,
Here's a patch for PR 61561
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61561).
It fixes ICE.
Reg. tested on arm15.
--Marat
arm.md.diff.diff
Description: Binary data
30 matches
Mail list logo