Re: [PATCH] Fix gcc.target/aarch64/sve/peel_ind_1.c for -mcmodel=tiny

2018-02-01 Thread James Greenhalgh
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 04:28:13PM +, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > Fix test failures with -mcmodel=tiny when adr is generated instead of adrp. > > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/peel_ind_1.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve scan-assembler > \\tadrp\\tx[0-9]+, x\\n > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/peel_ind_2.c

Re: [PATCH] Fix gcc.target/aarch64/sve/peel_ind_1.c for -mcmodel=tiny

2018-01-26 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 24/01/18 20:10, Richard Sandiford wrote: Szabolcs Nagy writes: Fix test failures with -mcmodel=tiny when adr is generated instead of adrp. FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/peel_ind_1.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve scan-assembler \\tadrp\\tx[0-9]+, x\\n FAIL:

Re: [PATCH] Fix gcc.target/aarch64/sve/peel_ind_1.c for -mcmodel=tiny

2018-01-24 Thread Richard Sandiford
Szabolcs Nagy writes: > Fix test failures with -mcmodel=tiny when adr is generated instead of adrp. > > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/peel_ind_1.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve > scan-assembler \\tadrp\\tx[0-9]+, x\\n > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/peel_ind_2.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve >

[PATCH] Fix gcc.target/aarch64/sve/peel_ind_1.c for -mcmodel=tiny

2018-01-24 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
Fix test failures with -mcmodel=tiny when adr is generated instead of adrp. FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/peel_ind_1.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve scan-assembler \\tadrp\\tx[0-9]+, x\\n FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/peel_ind_2.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve scan-assembler \\tadrp\\tx[0-9]+, x\\n FAIL: