On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 04:28:13PM +, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> Fix test failures with -mcmodel=tiny when adr is generated instead of adrp.
>
> FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/peel_ind_1.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve scan-assembler
> \\tadrp\\tx[0-9]+, x\\n
> FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/peel_ind_2.c
On 24/01/18 20:10, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Szabolcs Nagy writes:
Fix test failures with -mcmodel=tiny when adr is generated instead of adrp.
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/peel_ind_1.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve
scan-assembler \\tadrp\\tx[0-9]+, x\\n
FAIL:
Szabolcs Nagy writes:
> Fix test failures with -mcmodel=tiny when adr is generated instead of adrp.
>
> FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/peel_ind_1.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve
> scan-assembler \\tadrp\\tx[0-9]+, x\\n
> FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/peel_ind_2.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve
>
Fix test failures with -mcmodel=tiny when adr is generated instead of adrp.
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/peel_ind_1.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve scan-assembler
\\tadrp\\tx[0-9]+, x\\n
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/peel_ind_2.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve scan-assembler
\\tadrp\\tx[0-9]+, x\\n
FAIL: