On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The following patch fixes an ICE where one of the range tests
> is SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT of a bool/_Bool or unsigned : 1 bitfield.
> In that case, we don't know where to put the adjusted range test.
> The patch for this uncommon case gives up,
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:27:16PM +0100, Michael Matz wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > + /* If op is default def SSA_NAME, there is no place to insert the
> > + new comparison. Give up, unless we can use OP itself as the
> > + range test. */
> > + if (op &&
Hi,
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> + /* If op is default def SSA_NAME, there is no place to insert the
> + new comparison. Give up, unless we can use OP itself as the
> + range test. */
> + if (op && SSA_NAME_IS_DEFAULT_DEF (op))
> +{
> + if (op == range->exp
>
Hi!
The following patch fixes an ICE where one of the range tests
is SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT of a bool/_Bool or unsigned : 1 bitfield.
In that case, we don't know where to put the adjusted range test.
The patch for this uncommon case gives up, unless the range test
can be the SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT itself,
