On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Cong Hou wrote:
Hi
PR6 (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6) is caused by
GCC vectorizer. The bug appears when handling vectorization patterns. When
a pattern statement has additional new statements stored in pattern_def_seq
in vect_transform_loop(),
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 09:41:59AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
Is that because si and pattern_def_si point to the same stmts? Then
I'd prefer to do
if (is_store)
{
...
pattern_def_seq = NULL;
}
else if (!transform_pattern_stmt gsi_end_p (pattern_def_si))
{
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 5:06 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 09:41:59AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
Is that because si and pattern_def_si point to the same stmts? Then
I'd prefer to do
if (is_store)
{
...
pattern_def_seq = NULL;
On February 1, 2014 12:06:55 AM GMT+01:00, Cong Hou co...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 5:06 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 09:41:59AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
Is that because si and pattern_def_si point to the same stmts?
Then
I'd prefer
Wrong format. Send it again.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Cong Hou co...@google.com wrote:
Hi
PR6 (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6) is caused by GCC
vectorizer. The bug appears when handling vectorization patterns. When a
pattern statement has additional new
