Re: [PATCH] Hexadecimal numbers in option arguments

2013-12-10 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: Hi Joseph, Forgot to follow up on this patch. Here it is with a small update to check if 'p' got updated to a difference position. Does this now look okay? OK. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com

Re: [PATCH] Hexadecimal numbers in option arguments

2013-12-09 Thread Chung-Lin Tang
On 2013/7/14 09:27 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: On Sun, 14 Jul 2013, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: Original patch posted as part of Nios II patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg01087.html This patch is to allow hexadecimal numbers to be used in option arguments, e.g.

[PATCH] Hexadecimal numbers in option arguments

2013-07-14 Thread Chung-Lin Tang
Original patch posted as part of Nios II patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg01087.html This patch is to allow hexadecimal numbers to be used in option arguments, e.g. -falign-loops=0x10 can now be used as equivalent to -falign-loops=16. Joseph, the patch has been modified to

Re: [PATCH] Hexadecimal numbers in option arguments

2013-07-14 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Sun, 14 Jul 2013, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: Original patch posted as part of Nios II patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg01087.html This patch is to allow hexadecimal numbers to be used in option arguments, e.g. -falign-loops=0x10 can now be used as equivalent to