On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 04:36:01PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:49:21PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > The following patch attempts to improve find_split_point inside of
> > complex MEM addresses, if the target supports REG + REG + const
> >
Hi Jakub,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:49:21PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> The following patch attempts to improve find_split_point inside of
> complex MEM addresses, if the target supports REG + REG + const
> addressing, but doesn't support more_complex_rtx + REG + const,
> try to split it at
Hi!
The following patch attempts to improve find_split_point inside of
complex MEM addresses, if the target supports REG + REG + const
addressing, but doesn't support more_complex_rtx + REG + const,
try to split it at more_complex_rtx rather than more_complex_rtx + REG.
On the original testcase
