On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/20/2013 04:49 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jeff Law l...@redhat.com writes:
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times Replaced 8 forwprop1} } */
$ grep -c Replaced forwprop-28.c.022t.forwprop1
16
;; Function test (test,
Jeff Law l...@redhat.com writes:
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times Replaced 8 forwprop1} } */
$ grep -c Replaced forwprop-28.c.022t.forwprop1
16
;; Function test (test, funcdef_no=0, decl_uid=1388, symbol_order=0)
Replaced 'rotate_7 == 0' with '_6 == 0'
Replaced '_6 == 0' with
On 06/20/2013 04:49 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jeff Law l...@redhat.com writes:
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times Replaced 8 forwprop1} } */
$ grep -c Replaced forwprop-28.c.022t.forwprop1
16
;; Function test (test, funcdef_no=0, decl_uid=1388, symbol_order=0)
Replaced 'rotate_7 ==
2013/6/19 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-28.c: New test.
In the gnu coding standard we have a space before
the open-parentheses. Would that be great to have
testcase follow this convention as well? :)
If so, then...
diff --git
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 03:02:38PM +0800, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
In the gnu coding standard we have a space before
the open-parentheses. Would that be great to have
testcase follow this convention as well? :)
If so, then...
Testcases generally don't need to follow the coding conventions,
they
2013/6/19 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 03:02:38PM +0800, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
In the gnu coding standard we have a space before
the open-parentheses. Would that be great to have
testcase follow this convention as well? :)
If so, then...
Testcases generally don't
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:08 AM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
The notable changes since the last version:
First, it should properly handle signed single bit types, though I haven't
tested it with real code.
Second, the transformation is only applied when the result is used in a
On 06/19/2013 01:02 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
2013/6/19 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-28.c: New test.
In the gnu coding standard we have a space before
the open-parentheses. Would that be great to have
testcase follow this convention as well? :)
If so, then...
On 19 June 2013 15:57, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/19/2013 01:02 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
2013/6/19 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-28.c: New test.
In the gnu coding standard we have a space before
the open-parentheses. Would that be great to have
On 06/19/2013 10:02 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On 19 June 2013 15:57, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/19/2013 01:02 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
2013/6/19 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-28.c: New test.
In the gnu coding standard we have a space
The notable changes since the last version:
First, it should properly handle signed single bit types, though I
haven't tested it with real code.
Second, the transformation is only applied when the result is used in a
conditional. Thus it's much less likely to pessimize targets with
11 matches
Mail list logo