On 3 December 2014 at 14:36, Martin Jambor wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:53:54AM +, Jay Foad wrote:
>> > Index: src/gcc/ipa-prop.h
>> > ===
>> > --- src.orig/gcc/ipa-prop.h
>> > +++ src/gcc/ipa-prop.h
>> > @@ -144,6 +144,17
Hi,
thank you very much for pointing out all the spelling mistakes. I
suppose you could tell I was writing this in a hurry :-) Nevertheless
I should probably make a habit of spell checking stuff before
sending it out.
As far as your question is concerned:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:53:54AM +0
> Index: src/gcc/ipa-cp.c
> ===
> --- src.orig/gcc/ipa-cp.c
> +++ src/gcc/ipa-cp.c
> @@ -262,6 +262,9 @@ public:
>ipcp_lattice ctxlat;
>/* Lattices describing aggregate parts. */
>ipcp_agg_lattice *aggs;
> + /* Alignment
Hi,
thanks for the comments.
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:40:59PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > 2014-11-19 Martin Jambor
> > >
> > > * ipa-prop.h (ipa_alignment): New type.
> > > (ipa_jump_func): New field alignment.
> > > (ipcp_transformation_summary) New type.
> > > (ipcp_grow_trans
> > 2014-11-19 Martin Jambor
> >
> > * ipa-prop.h (ipa_alignment): New type.
> > (ipa_jump_func): New field alignment.
> > (ipcp_transformation_summary) New type.
> > (ipcp_grow_transformations_if_necessary): Declare.
> > (ipa_node_agg_replacements): Removed.
> > (ipcp_t
Ping (this is a new feature submitted in stage1 so I'd really
appreciate a review before it is going to be deemed "too late").
Thanks,
Martin
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:32:53AM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
...
>
> 2014-11-19 Martin Jambor
>
> * ipa-prop.h (ipa_alignment): N
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 01:05:23PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 2:04 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this patch adds very simple propagation of alignment of pointers to
> > IPA-CP. Because I have not attempted to estimate profitability of
> > such propagati
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 2:04 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch adds very simple propagation of alignment of pointers to
> IPA-CP. Because I have not attempted to estimate profitability of
> such propagation in any way, it does not do any cloning, just
> propagation when the alignment
On 11/15/2014 02:04 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
this patch adds very simple propagation of alignment of pointers to
IPA-CP. Because I have not attempted to estimate profitability of
such propagation in any way, it does not do any cloning, just
propagation when the alignment is known and the s
Hi,
this patch adds very simple propagation of alignment of pointers to
IPA-CP. Because I have not attempted to estimate profitability of
such propagation in any way, it does not do any cloning, just
propagation when the alignment is known and the same in all contexts.
I have seen this shrinking
10 matches
Mail list logo
