On 7 December 2016 at 13:24, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> I'd like to backport this (r238916) to the gcc-6-branch too.
>
> It's been very useful on trunk. The only problems are when we backport
> new tests from trunk to the branch and forget that the effective
> target doesn't
On 29/07/16 20:43 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I've been working on some changes to let the libstdc++ testsuite use
the same approach as G++ to specify a minimum language dialect for
tests. That means instead of hardcoding { dg-options "-std=gnu++11" }
we can use { dg-do run { target c++11 } }
On Jul 29, 2016, at 12:43 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> I've been working on some changes to let the libstdc++ testsuite use
> the same approach as G++ to specify a minimum language dialect for
> tests. That means instead of hardcoding { dg-options "-std=gnu++11" }
> we can
I've been working on some changes to let the libstdc++ testsuite use
the same approach as G++ to specify a minimum language dialect for
tests. That means instead of hardcoding { dg-options "-std=gnu++11" }
we can use { dg-do run { target c++11 } } and the test will be run for
any implicit or