On 08/28/2018 09:34 AM, MCC CS wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I guess I haven't been clear enough. I don't
> have push access, is it possible for you to
> push my patch to trunk?
>
> The same patch as:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-08/msg01688.html
> but updated dates.
>
> 2018-08-28 MCC CS
Hi again,
I guess I haven't been clear enough. I don't
have push access, is it possible for you to
push my patch to trunk?
The same patch as:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-08/msg01688.html
but updated dates.
2018-08-28 MCC CS
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/87009
*
Added :s to the second pattern, updated dates. Thank you so much for
your reviews!
2018-08-27 MCC CS
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/87009
* match.pd: Add boolean optimizations.
2018-08-27 MCC CS
gcc/testsuite/
PR tree-optimization/87009
*
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 1:52 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
>
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 7:20 PM MCC CS wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> I have updated the testcase and run "make check" on Ubuntu x86_64.
> >> All of them passed. (However the last part
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 7:20 PM MCC CS wrote:
Hello all,
I have updated the testcase and run "make check" on Ubuntu x86_64.
All of them passed. (However the last part "do-check" couldn't be
run, probably due to a missing testsuite dependency?)
The
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 7:20 PM MCC CS wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I have updated the testcase and run "make check" on Ubuntu x86_64.
> All of them passed. (However the last part "do-check" couldn't be
> run, probably due to a missing testsuite dependency?)
>
> The match.pd is the same as the
Hi all,
One week ago I proposed a patch that catches
~(~x | y), (~x | y) & (x | ~y) and
(~x | y) ^ (x | ~y)
Although it was straightforward, it got
only one review. Could you please review it?
If you find it OK, I don't have push access.
Is it possible for you to push it?
Best regards.
History:
Hello all,
I have updated the testcase and run "make check" on Ubuntu x86_64.
All of them passed. (However the last part "do-check" couldn't be
run, probably due to a missing testsuite dependency?)
The match.pd is the same as the original patch, and I have
updated change-summaries and improved
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018, MCC CS wrote:
this patch optimizes ~(~x | y), (~x | y) & (x | ~y) and
(~x | y) ^ (x | ~y).
Thank you. I didn't mean to force you to add the extra transformations to
your patch, but now that they are here, that's good :-)
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/87009
* match.pd:
Hi everyone,
this patch optimizes ~(~x | y), (~x | y) & (x | ~y) and
(~x | y) ^ (x | ~y). Thanks to Marc Glisse
for noticing that the last two weren't optimized.
I'll post the test results soon, it took three hours in
addition to timeouts and I had to terminate it.
Waiting for your comments.
10 matches
Mail list logo
