Re: [PATCH] PR/68089: C++-11: Ingore "alignas(0)".

2016-04-29 Thread Andreas Krebbel
On 12/31/2015 12:50 PM, Dominik Vogt wrote: > The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling of "alignas(0)" which > should be ignored but currently generates an error message. A > test case is included; the patch has been tested on S390x. Since > it's a language issue it should be independent of the

Re: [PING 5, PATCH] PR/68089: C++-11: Ingore "alignas(0)".

2016-04-27 Thread Jeff Law
On 04/05/2016 03:43 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote: On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:33:21PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:53:08PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote: On 12/31/2015 04:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote: The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling of "alignas(0)" which should be ignored

Re: [PING 7, PATCH] PR/68089: C++-11: Ingore "alignas(0)".

2016-04-27 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:33:21PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:53:08PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote: > > On 12/31/2015 04:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > >The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling of "alignas(0)" which > > >should be ignored but currently generates an error

Re: [PING 6, PATCH] PR/68089: C++-11: Ingore "alignas(0)".

2016-04-12 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:33:21PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:53:08PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote: > > On 12/31/2015 04:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > >The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling of "alignas(0)" which > > >should be ignored but currently generates an error

Re: [PING 5, PATCH] PR/68089: C++-11: Ingore "alignas(0)".

2016-04-05 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:33:21PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:53:08PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote: > > On 12/31/2015 04:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > >The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling of "alignas(0)" which > > >should be ignored but currently generates an error

Re: [PING 4, PATCH] PR/68089: C++-11: Ingore "alignas(0)".

2016-03-15 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:33:21PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:53:08PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote: > > On 12/31/2015 04:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > >The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling of "alignas(0)" which > > >should be ignored but currently generates an error

Re: [PING 3, PATCH] PR/68089: C++-11: Ingore "alignas(0)".

2016-03-01 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:33:21PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:53:08PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote: > > On 12/31/2015 04:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > >The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling of "alignas(0)" which > > >should be ignored but currently generates an error

Re: [PING 2, PATCH] PR/68089: C++-11: Ingore "alignas(0)".

2016-02-22 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:33:21PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:53:08PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote: > > On 12/31/2015 04:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > >The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling of "alignas(0)" which > > >should be ignored but currently generates an error

Re: [PING, PATCH] PR/68089: C++-11: Ingore "alignas(0)".

2016-02-05 Thread Dominik Vogt
Can this be approved? https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69089 On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:33:21PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:53:08PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote: > > On 12/31/2015 04:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > >The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling

Re: [PATCH] PR/68089: C++-11: Ingore "alignas(0)".

2016-01-04 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:53:08PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote: > On 12/31/2015 04:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote: > >The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling of "alignas(0)" which > >should be ignored but currently generates an error message. A > >test case is included; the patch has been tested on

Re: [PATCH] PR/68089: C++-11: Ingore "alignas(0)".

2016-01-04 Thread Martin Sebor
On 01/04/2016 04:33 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote: On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:53:08PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote: On 12/31/2015 04:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote: The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling of "alignas(0)" which should be ignored but currently generates an error message. A test case is

Re: [PATCH] PR/68089: C++-11: Ingore "alignas(0)".

2016-01-01 Thread Martin Sebor
On 12/31/2015 04:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote: The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling of "alignas(0)" which should be ignored but currently generates an error message. A test case is included; the patch has been tested on S390x. Since it's a language issue it should be independent of the

[PATCH] PR/68089: C++-11: Ingore "alignas(0)".

2015-12-31 Thread Dominik Vogt
* g++.dg/cpp0x/alignas5.C: New test. >From 59787d0af77d0a45dabb06ac7fc70e9bd7a9d5d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dominik Vogt <v...@de.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:08:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] PR/68089: C++-11: Ingore "alignas(0)". error message. This is requ