On 12/31/2015 12:50 PM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling of "alignas(0)" which
> should be ignored but currently generates an error message. A
> test case is included; the patch has been tested on S390x. Since
> it's a language issue it should be independent of the
On 04/05/2016 03:43 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:33:21PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:53:08PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 12/31/2015 04:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling of "alignas(0)" which
should be ignored
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:33:21PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:53:08PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > On 12/31/2015 04:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > >The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling of "alignas(0)" which
> > >should be ignored but currently generates an error
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:33:21PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:53:08PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > On 12/31/2015 04:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > >The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling of "alignas(0)" which
> > >should be ignored but currently generates an error
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:33:21PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:53:08PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > On 12/31/2015 04:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > >The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling of "alignas(0)" which
> > >should be ignored but currently generates an error
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:33:21PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:53:08PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > On 12/31/2015 04:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > >The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling of "alignas(0)" which
> > >should be ignored but currently generates an error
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:33:21PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:53:08PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > On 12/31/2015 04:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > >The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling of "alignas(0)" which
> > >should be ignored but currently generates an error
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:33:21PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:53:08PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > On 12/31/2015 04:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > >The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling of "alignas(0)" which
> > >should be ignored but currently generates an error
Can this be approved?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69089
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:33:21PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:53:08PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > On 12/31/2015 04:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > >The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:53:08PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 12/31/2015 04:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling of "alignas(0)" which
> >should be ignored but currently generates an error message. A
> >test case is included; the patch has been tested on
On 01/04/2016 04:33 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 05:53:08PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 12/31/2015 04:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling of "alignas(0)" which
should be ignored but currently generates an error message. A
test case is
On 12/31/2015 04:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
The attached patch fixes C++-11 handling of "alignas(0)" which
should be ignored but currently generates an error message. A
test case is included; the patch has been tested on S390x. Since
it's a language issue it should be independent of the
* g++.dg/cpp0x/alignas5.C: New test.
>From 59787d0af77d0a45dabb06ac7fc70e9bd7a9d5d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dominik Vogt <v...@de.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:08:52 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] PR/68089: C++-11: Ingore "alignas(0)".
error message.
This is requ
13 matches
Mail list logo