Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/102917 - PDT type parameters are not restricted to default integer

Hi Tobias, > OK. I wonder whether a valid len/kind example should be added which uses > such a PDT with non-default-kind integer. the testcase pdt_4.f03 did actually check for the error message that gets removed and had to be adjusted. Removing just the dg-error does that job :-) Thanks,

Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/102917 - PDT type parameters are not restricted to default integer

Dear Harald, dear all, On 24.10.21 21:00, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote: I've created PR 102917 for tracking this issue and packaged the attached patch. Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK mainline? OK. I wonder whether a valid len/kind example should be added which uses such a PDT with

Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/102917 - PDT type parameters are not restricted to default integer

On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 09:00:52PM +0200, Harald Anlauf wrote: > Dear Fortranners, Steve, > > I've created PR 102917 for tracking this issue and packaged > the attached patch. > > Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK mainline? > Thanks for picking this up. The patch looks good to me, but

[PATCH] PR fortran/102917 - PDT type parameters are not restricted to default integer

Dear Fortranners, Steve, I've created PR 102917 for tracking this issue and packaged the attached patch. Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK mainline? Thanks, Harald > Gesendet: Freitag, 22. Oktober 2021 um 22:25 Uhr > Von: "Steve Kargl" > An: "Harald Anlauf" > Cc: fort...@gcc.gnu.org >