Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/82049 -- resolve a charlen if possible

Thanks. A version of the patch has been commit to 6-branch, 7-branch, and trunk. One regression down, many more to go. -- steve On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 08:10:41AM +, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > Hi Steve, > > That's OK for trunk and, if you are possessed of the intestinal > fortitude, 6-

Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/82049 -- resolve a charlen if possible

Hi Steve, That's OK for trunk and, if you are possessed of the intestinal fortitude, 6- and 7-branches. Thanks Paul On 7 February 2018 at 02:17, Steve Kargl wrote: > The attached patch fixes PR fortran/82049. Prior to this > patch, gfortran was fouling up

[PATCH] PR fortran/82049 -- resolve a charlen if possible

The attached patch fixes PR fortran/82049. Prior to this patch, gfortran was fouling up the resolution of the charlen expression in the testcase. The immediately tries to resolve the length while parsing the type-spec. While here, I've introduced an optimization that causes