Re: [PATCH] PR fortran 88116,88467 -- Catch array constructor errors

2018-12-17 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 07:46:45AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 11:45:11AM +0100, Dominique d'Humières wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > > > The patch works as expected. > > > > Is "Can\’t " instead of "Can’t " really necessary? > > > > I don't remember how dejagnu handles quotes

Re: [PATCH] PR fortran 88116,88467 -- Catch array constructor errors

2018-12-16 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 11:45:11AM +0100, Dominique d'Humières wrote: > Hi Steve, > > The patch works as expected. > > Is "Can\’t " instead of "Can’t " really necessary? > I don't remember how dejagnu handles quotes in the regex expression. "Can\'t" seems to work (for me). If you want to

Re: [PATCH] PR fortran 88116,88467 -- Catch array constructor errors

2018-12-16 Thread Dominique d'Humières
Hi Steve, The patch works as expected. Is "Can\’t " instead of "Can’t " really necessary? Thanks for the patch, Dominique

[PATCH] PR fortran 88116,88467 -- Catch array constructor errors

2018-12-13 Thread Steve Kargl
The attached patch has been regression tested on x86_64-*-freebsd. It fixes to PR. Both PR are related to errors in array constructors. PR fortran/88116 was not reporting an error on type mismatches with nested array constructors. PR fortran/88467 was silently accepting a CHARACTER entity