On 31/10/18 12:31 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
The introduction of the empty __pair_base base class for PR 86751
changed the layout of std::pair, ...>. The outer pair and
its first member both have a base class of the same type, which cannot
exist at the same address. This causes the first membe
The introduction of the empty __pair_base base class for PR 86751
changed the layout of std::pair, ...>. The outer pair and
its first member both have a base class of the same type, which cannot
exist at the same address. This causes the first member to be at a
non-zero offset.
The solution is to
