RE: [PATCH] PR61868

2014-07-31 Thread Bingfeng Mei
Thanks, Jeff. Checked in. Bingfeng -Original Message- From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] Sent: 31 July 2014 04:43 To: Bingfeng Mei; Richard Biener Cc: Andi Kleen; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR61868 On 07/30/14 09:20, Bingfeng Mei wrote: Yes, that fix

Re: [PATCH] PR61868

2014-07-30 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Bingfeng Mei b...@broadcom.com wrote: Hi, Please find the patches for pr61868. The problem is that even with -frandom-seed gcc always uses 0 instead of specified number/string for places such as lto section names. init_random_seed is never called with

RE: [PATCH] PR61868

2014-07-30 Thread Bingfeng Mei
? Bingfeng -Original Message- From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] Sent: 30 July 2014 08:47 To: Bingfeng Mei; Andi Kleen Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR61868 On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Bingfeng Mei b...@broadcom.com wrote: Hi, Please

Re: [PATCH] PR61868

2014-07-30 Thread Richard Biener
- From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] Sent: 30 July 2014 08:47 To: Bingfeng Mei; Andi Kleen Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR61868 On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Bingfeng Mei b...@broadcom.com wrote: Hi, Please find the patches for pr61868

RE: [PATCH] PR61868

2014-07-30 Thread Bingfeng Mei
It did take a lot of time, but passed the LTO bootstrap. Bingfeng -Original Message- From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] Sent: 30 July 2014 10:43 To: Bingfeng Mei Cc: Andi Kleen; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR61868 On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10

RE: [PATCH] PR61868

2014-07-30 Thread Bingfeng Mei
; flag_random_seed = val; + init_random_seed (); return old; } Bingfeng -Original Message- From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] Sent: 30 July 2014 10:43 To: Bingfeng Mei Cc: Andi Kleen; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR61868 On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:52 AM

Re: [PATCH] PR61868

2014-07-30 Thread Richard Biener
. Richard. Bingfeng -Original Message- From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] Sent: 30 July 2014 10:43 To: Bingfeng Mei Cc: Andi Kleen; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR61868 On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Bingfeng Mei b...@broadcom.com wrote

Re: [PATCH] PR61868

2014-07-30 Thread Andi Kleen
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:46:48AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Bingfeng Mei b...@broadcom.com wrote: Hi, Please find the patches for pr61868. The problem is that even with -frandom-seed gcc always uses 0 instead of specified number/string for places

RE: [PATCH] PR61868

2014-07-30 Thread Bingfeng Mei
() +{ + foo (100); + return 0; +} +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler \.gnu\.lto.*.12345 } } */ -Original Message- From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] Sent: 30 July 2014 14:08 To: Bingfeng Mei Cc: Andi Kleen; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR61868 On Wed

Re: [PATCH] PR61868

2014-07-30 Thread Jeff Law
On 07/30/14 09:20, Bingfeng Mei wrote: Yes, that fix is better. Here are updated patches. LTO-bootstrapped and tested. OK? Bingfeng Index: ChangeLog === --- ChangeLog (revision 213152) +++ ChangeLog (working copy) @@ -1,3

[PATCH] PR61868

2014-07-29 Thread Bingfeng Mei
Hi, Please find the patches for pr61868. The problem is that even with -frandom-seed gcc always uses 0 instead of specified number/string for places such as lto section names. init_random_seed is never called with -frandom-seed. Bootstrapped and tested on x86-64. OK for trunk? Thanks,