Thanks, Jeff. Checked in.
Bingfeng
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
Sent: 31 July 2014 04:43
To: Bingfeng Mei; Richard Biener
Cc: Andi Kleen; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR61868
On 07/30/14 09:20, Bingfeng Mei wrote:
Yes, that fix
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Bingfeng Mei b...@broadcom.com wrote:
Hi,
Please find the patches for pr61868. The problem is that even with
-frandom-seed gcc always uses 0 instead of specified number/string for places
such as lto section names. init_random_seed is never called with
?
Bingfeng
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: 30 July 2014 08:47
To: Bingfeng Mei; Andi Kleen
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR61868
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Bingfeng Mei b...@broadcom.com wrote:
Hi,
Please
-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: 30 July 2014 08:47
To: Bingfeng Mei; Andi Kleen
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR61868
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Bingfeng Mei b...@broadcom.com wrote:
Hi,
Please find the patches for pr61868
It did take a lot of time, but passed the LTO bootstrap.
Bingfeng
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: 30 July 2014 10:43
To: Bingfeng Mei
Cc: Andi Kleen; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR61868
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10
;
flag_random_seed = val;
+ init_random_seed ();
return old;
}
Bingfeng
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: 30 July 2014 10:43
To: Bingfeng Mei
Cc: Andi Kleen; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR61868
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:52 AM
.
Richard.
Bingfeng
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: 30 July 2014 10:43
To: Bingfeng Mei
Cc: Andi Kleen; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR61868
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Bingfeng Mei b...@broadcom.com wrote
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:46:48AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Bingfeng Mei b...@broadcom.com wrote:
Hi,
Please find the patches for pr61868. The problem is that even with
-frandom-seed gcc always uses 0 instead of specified number/string for
places
()
+{
+ foo (100);
+ return 0;
+}
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler \.gnu\.lto.*.12345 } } */
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: 30 July 2014 14:08
To: Bingfeng Mei
Cc: Andi Kleen; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR61868
On Wed
On 07/30/14 09:20, Bingfeng Mei wrote:
Yes, that fix is better. Here are updated patches. LTO-bootstrapped and tested.
OK?
Bingfeng
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog (revision 213152)
+++ ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3
Hi,
Please find the patches for pr61868. The problem is that even with
-frandom-seed gcc always uses 0 instead of specified number/string for places
such as lto section names. init_random_seed is never called with -frandom-seed.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86-64. OK for trunk?
Thanks,
11 matches
Mail list logo