On 7/13/21 4:54 PM, Tamar Christina wrote:
Hi Martin,
-Original Message-
From: Gcc-patches On Behalf Of Martin Liška
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 11:09 AM
To: Joseph Myers
Cc: GCC Development ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Port GCC documentation to Sphinx
On 6/28/21
On 7/12/21 7:18 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/29/21 4:09 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/28/21 5:33 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
Are formatted manuals (HTML, PDF, man, info) corresponding to this patch
version also available for review?
I've just uploaded them here:
Hi Martin,
> -Original Message-
> From: Gcc-patches bounces+tamar.christina=arm@gcc.gnu.org> On Behalf Of Martin Liška
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 11:09 AM
> To: Joseph Myers
> Cc: GCC Development ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Port GCC do
On 6/29/21 4:09 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/28/21 5:33 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
Are formatted manuals (HTML, PDF, man, info) corresponding to this patch
version also available for review?
I've just uploaded them here:
https://splichal.eu/gccsphinx-final/
Martin
I think listing the -Wfoo
Eli Zaretskii writes:
>> Hans-Peter Nilsson writes:
>> > I've read the discussion downthread, but I seem to miss (a recap
>> > of) the benefits of moving to Sphinx. Maybe other have too and
>> > it'd be a good idea to repeat them? Otherwise, the impression
>> > is not so good, as all I see is
> From: Richard Sandiford
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , g...@gcc.gnu.org,
> gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, jos...@codesourcery.com
> Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2021 10:17:38 +0100
>
> Hans-Peter Nilsson writes:
> > I've read the discussion downthread, but I seem to miss (a recap
> > of) the benefits of moving to
Hans-Peter Nilsson writes:
> I've read the discussion downthread, but I seem to miss (a recap
> of) the benefits of moving to Sphinx. Maybe other have too and
> it'd be a good idea to repeat them? Otherwise, the impression
> is not so good, as all I see is bits here and there getting lost
> in
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021, Eli Zaretskii via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Cc: jos...@codesourcery.com, g...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> > From: Martin Li?ka
> > Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:11:03 +0200
> > > 4. Menus lost the short descriptions of the sub-sections. Example:
> > >
> > >*
On 7/2/21 12:31 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Cc: jos...@codesourcery.com, g...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
From: Martin Liška
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 11:30:02 +0200
So the purpose of having the comma there is to avoid having a period
in the middle of a sentence, which is added by makeinfo
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , g...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
> jos...@codesourcery.com
> From: Martin Liška
> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 11:40:06 +0200
>
> > It must
> > look sensible without that. In this case it seems that already the
> > generated .texinfo input to makeinfo is bad, where
> Cc: jos...@codesourcery.com, g...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> From: Martin Liška
> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 11:30:02 +0200
>
> > So the purpose of having the comma there is to avoid having a period
> > in the middle of a sentence, which is added by makeinfo (because the
> > Info
On 7/1/21 5:06 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, 1 Jul 2021, Martin Liška wrote:
On 7/1/21 3:33 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Cc: jos...@codesourcery.com, g...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
From: Martin Liška
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 14:44:10 +0200
It helps some, but not all of the
On 7/1/21 6:58 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Cc: jos...@codesourcery.com, g...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
From: Martin Liška
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 18:04:24 +0200
Emacs doesn't hide the period. But there shouldn't be a period to
begin with, since it's the middle of a sentence. The
> Cc: jos...@codesourcery.com, g...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> From: Martin Liška
> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 18:04:24 +0200
>
> > Emacs doesn't hide the period. But there shouldn't be a period to
> > begin with, since it's the middle of a sentence. The correct way of
> > writing this
On 7/1/21 5:44 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Cc: jos...@codesourcery.com, g...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
From: Martin Liška
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 16:14:30 +0200
If I understand the notes correct, the '.' should be also hidden by e.g. Emacs.
No, it doesn't. The actual text in the Info
> Cc: jos...@codesourcery.com, g...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> From: Martin Liška
> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 16:14:30 +0200
>
> >> If I understand the notes correct, the '.' should be also hidden by e.g.
> >> Emacs.
> >
> > No, it doesn't. The actual text in the Info file is:
> >
>
Hello,
On Thu, 1 Jul 2021, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 7/1/21 3:33 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > Cc: jos...@codesourcery.com, g...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> > > From: Martin Liška
> > > Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 14:44:10 +0200
> > >
> > > > It helps some, but not all of the issues
On 7/1/21 3:33 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Cc: jos...@codesourcery.com, g...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
From: Martin Liška
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 14:44:10 +0200
It helps some, but not all of the issues disappear. For example,
stuff like this is still hard to read:
To select this
> Cc: jos...@codesourcery.com, g...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> From: Martin Liška
> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 14:44:10 +0200
>
> > It helps some, but not all of the issues disappear. For example,
> > stuff like this is still hard to read:
> >
> >To select this standard in GCC, use
On 6/30/21 3:09 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Cc: jos...@codesourcery.com, g...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
From: Martin Liška
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:11:03 +0200
(Admittedly, Emacs by default hides some of the text of a
cross-reference, but not hiding them in this case produces an even
On 6/30/21 5:43 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Cc: jos...@codesourcery.com, g...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
From: Martin Liška
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 16:04:32 +0200
Thanks, but does that mean @var will no longer stand out in the
produced Info format? That'd be sub-optimal, I think,
> Cc: jos...@codesourcery.com, g...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> From: Martin Liška
> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 16:04:32 +0200
>
> > Thanks, but does that mean @var will no longer stand out in the
> > produced Info format? That'd be sub-optimal, I think, because a clear
> > reference to
On 6/30/21 3:38 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Cc: jos...@codesourcery.com, g...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
From: Martin Liška
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 15:28:40 +0200
‘@`file'’
Read command-line options from ‘`file'’. The options read are
inserted in place of the
> Cc: jos...@codesourcery.com, g...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> From: Martin Liška
> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 15:28:40 +0200
>
> >‘@`file'’
> >
> > Read command-line options from ‘`file'’. The options read are
> > inserted in place of the original ‘@`file'’ option.
On 6/29/21 6:57 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
2. The translation of @var produces double-quoting in Info, here's an
example:
The usual way to run GCC is to run the executable called ‘gcc’, or
‘`machine'-gcc’ when cross-compiling, or ‘`machine'-gcc-`version'’ to
run a specific version of
> Cc: jos...@codesourcery.com, g...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> From: Martin Liška
> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 12:11:03 +0200
>
> > (Admittedly, Emacs by default hides some of the text of a
> > cross-reference, but not hiding them in this case produces an even
> > less legible text.)
>
On 6/30/21 12:55 PM, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
Hi Martin,
On 29.06.2021 13:09, Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/28/21 5:33 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
Are formatted manuals (HTML, PDF, man, info) corresponding to this patch
version also available for review?
I've just uploaded them here:
On 6/29/21 6:57 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
5. There's some strange bug with symbols inside parentheses. For
example:
In GNU C and C++, you can use function attributes to specify certain
function properties that may help the compiler optimize calls or check
code more carefully for
On 6/30/21 12:14 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 30/06/2021 05:47, Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/29/21 12:50 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 29/06/2021 11:09, Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/28/21 5:33 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
Are formatted manuals (HTML, PDF, man, info) corresponding to this patch
Hi Martin,
On 29.06.2021 13:09, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 6/28/21 5:33 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> Are formatted manuals (HTML, PDF, man, info) corresponding to this patch
>> version also available for review?
>
> I've just uploaded them here:
> https://splichal.eu/gccsphinx-final/
>
> Martin
I've
On 6/30/21 12:11 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
Seems correct to be, but it's likely not. Let me investigate that.
It's a real issue in Sphinx. I've just addressed that with:
https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/pull/9390
Cheers,
Martin
On 30/06/2021 05:47, Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/29/21 12:50 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 29/06/2021 11:09, Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/28/21 5:33 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
Are formatted manuals (HTML, PDF, man, info) corresponding to this
patch
version also available for review?
I've just
On 6/29/21 6:57 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
From: Martin Liška
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 12:09:23 +0200
Cc: GCC Development , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
On 6/28/21 5:33 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
Are formatted manuals (HTML, PDF, man, info) corresponding to this patch
version also available for review?
On 6/29/21 12:50 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 29/06/2021 11:09, Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/28/21 5:33 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
Are formatted manuals (HTML, PDF, man, info) corresponding to this patch
version also available for review?
I've just uploaded them here:
> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 19:57:11 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii via Gcc
> Cc: g...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, jos...@codesourcery.com
>
> Or how about this:
>
> `Overall Options'
>
>See Options Controlling the Kind of Output.
>
>*note -c. *note -S. *note -E. *note
> From: Martin Liška
> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 12:09:23 +0200
> Cc: GCC Development , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>
> On 6/28/21 5:33 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > Are formatted manuals (HTML, PDF, man, info) corresponding to this patch
> > version also available for review?
>
> I've just uploaded
On 29/06/2021 11:09, Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/28/21 5:33 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
Are formatted manuals (HTML, PDF, man, info) corresponding to this patch
version also available for review?
I've just uploaded them here:
https://splichal.eu/gccsphinx-final/
Martin
In the HTML version of
On 6/28/21 5:33 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
Are formatted manuals (HTML, PDF, man, info) corresponding to this patch
version also available for review?
I've just uploaded them here:
https://splichal.eu/gccsphinx-final/
Martin
Are formatted manuals (HTML, PDF, man, info) corresponding to this patch
version also available for review?
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
Hello.
I'm sending the complete patch set that includes ChangeLog entries.
Unfortunately,
majority of the patches are huge, that's why I sent like to a tarball:
https://splichal.eu/tmp/port-to-sphinx-v1.tar
The tarball contains the following patches:
19e06194746 Ada: port to Sphinx.
40 matches
Mail list logo
