On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Michael Meissner
meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 01:24:25PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Michael Meissner
meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
In backporting the power8 changes to the 4.8 branch, one of
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Michael Meissner
meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
In backporting the power8 changes to the 4.8 branch, one of the testers of
these patches noticed that libgcc cannot be built on a linux SPE target. The
reason was the _Decimal64 type did not have a proper move
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 01:24:25PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Michael Meissner
meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
In backporting the power8 changes to the 4.8 branch, one of the testers of
these patches noticed that libgcc cannot be built on a linux SPE
In backporting the power8 changes to the 4.8 branch, one of the testers of
these patches noticed that libgcc cannot be built on a linux SPE target. The
reason was the _Decimal64 type did not have a proper move insn in the SPE
environment. This patch fixes that issue. In looking at the patch, I
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Michael Meissner
meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
In backporting the power8 changes to the 4.8 branch, one of the testers of
these patches noticed that libgcc cannot be built on a linux SPE target. The
reason was the _Decimal64 type did not have a proper move
