On Sun, 28 Apr 2013, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 26/04/13 16:27, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 25/04/13 16:19, Richard Biener wrote:
SNIP
and compared to the previous patch changed the tree-ssa-tailmerge.c
part to deal with merging of loop latch and loop preheader (even
if that's a really bad
On 26/04/13 16:27, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 25/04/13 16:19, Richard Biener wrote:
SNIP
and compared to the previous patch changed the tree-ssa-tailmerge.c
part to deal with merging of loop latch and loop preheader (even
if that's a really bad idea) to not regress gcc.dg/pr50763.c.
Any
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 04:19:20PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
This is the patch that I consider final as a first step (to avoid
changing too much at once). I've analyzed the few failures
and compared to the previous patch changed the
On 25/04/13 16:19, Richard Biener wrote:
SNIP
and compared to the previous patch changed the tree-ssa-tailmerge.c
part to deal with merging of loop latch and loop preheader (even
if that's a really bad idea) to not regress gcc.dg/pr50763.c.
Any suggestion on how to improve that part welcome.
This is the patch that I consider final as a first step (to avoid
changing too much at once). I've analyzed the few failures
and compared to the previous patch changed the tree-ssa-tailmerge.c
part to deal with merging of loop latch and loop preheader (even
if that's a really bad idea) to not
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 04:19:20PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
This is the patch that I consider final as a first step (to avoid
changing too much at once). I've analyzed the few failures
and compared to the previous patch changed the tree-ssa-tailmerge.c
part to deal with merging of loop
