Hi，
I just tweaked the patch according to your advice and committed it.
Thanks so much for your help and advice.
Haochen Gui
On 13/11/2020 下午 5:27, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for the slow reply. Just one minor nit:
HAO CHEN GUI writes:
diff --git a/gcc/varasm.c b/gcc/varasm.c
Hi,
Sorry for the slow reply. Just one minor nit:
HAO CHEN GUI writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/varasm.c b/gcc/varasm.c
> index ea0b59cf44a..40502049b61 100644
> --- a/gcc/varasm.c
> +++ b/gcc/varasm.c
> @@ -727,12 +727,26 @@ switch_to_other_text_partition (void)
>switch_to_section
Hi,
Gentle ping this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/556744.html
Thanks
Gui Haochen
On 22/10/2020 上午 10:53, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
I had a wrong email setting and got your reply later. I modified the
patch according to your advice. Could you please review it again?
I had a wrong email setting and got your reply later. I modified the
patch according to your advice. Could you please review it again? Thanks.
On 2/10/2020 上午 1:47, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Sorry for the slow review.
HAO CHEN GUI via Gcc-patches writes:
diff --git a/gcc/config/mips/mips.c
Sorry for the slow review.
HAO CHEN GUI via Gcc-patches writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/config/mips/mips.c b/gcc/config/mips/mips.c
> index 513fc5fe295..6f5bf8d7d73 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/mips/mips.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/mips/mips.c
> @@ -9315,10 +9315,10 @@ mips_select_rtx_section (machine_mode
Hi,
Gentle ping this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-September/553809.html
Thanks
Gui Haochen
On 14/9/2020 上午 11:01, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
Hi,
Jump tables are put into text or rodata section originally. On some
platforms, it gains the performance benefit from absolute
Hi,
Jump tables are put into text or rodata section originally. On some
platforms, it gains the performance benefit from absolute address jump
tables. So I want to let absolute address jump table be relocatable.
This patch puts absolute jump table in read only relocation section if
the
