Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add vector fmin/fmax expanders.

Thanks, going to commit the attached. Regards Robin This patch adds expanders for fmin and fmax. As per RISC-V V Spec 1.0 vfmin/vfmax are IEEE 754-2019 compliant which differs from IEEE 754-2008 that fmin/fmax require (particularly in the signaling-NaN handling). Therefore the pattern

Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add vector fmin/fmax expanders.

LGTM as long as you add HONOR_SNANS juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai From: Robin Dapp Date: 2023-10-31 03:26 To: Joseph Myers CC: rdapp.gcc; gcc-patches; palmer; Kito Cheng; jeffreyalaw; juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add vector fmin/fmax expanders. > Aren't they actually the I

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add vector fmin/fmax expanders.

> Aren't they actually the IEEE 754-2019 operations (with different > signaling NaN semantics; C functions such as fmaximum in C23), not the > IEEE 754-2008 operations (C functions such as fmax)? V spec 1.0 says "The > vector floating-point vfmin and vfmax instructions have the same behavior

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add vector fmin/fmax expanders.

On Mon, 30 Oct 2023, Robin Dapp wrote: > Hi, > > this patch adds expanders for fmin and fmax and the associated > cond and reduc ones. As per RISC-V V spec 1.0 vfmin/vfmax are > IEEE 754-2008 compliant so that should be ok. Aren't they actually the IEEE 754-2019 operations (with different

[PATCH] RISC-V: Add vector fmin/fmax expanders.

Hi, this patch adds expanders for fmin and fmax and the associated cond and reduc ones. As per RISC-V V spec 1.0 vfmin/vfmax are IEEE 754-2008 compliant so that should be ok. Regards Robin gcc/ChangeLog: * config/riscv/autovec.md (3): fmax/fmin expanders. (cond_):