On 12/17/24 8:27 AM, Robin Dapp wrote:
Hi,
in PR117682 we build an interleaving pattern
{ 1, 201, 209, 25, 161, 105, 113, 185, 65, 9,
17, 89, 225, 169, 177, 249, 129, 73, 81, 153,
33, 233, 241, 57, 193, 137, 145, 217, 97, 41,
49, 121 };
with negative step expecting wraparo
On 12/18/24 1:17 PM, Patrick O'Neill wrote:
On 12/18/24 15:09, Jeff Law wrote:
On 12/17/24 8:27 AM, Robin Dapp wrote:
Hi,
in PR117682 we build an interleaving pattern
{ 1, 201, 209, 25, 161, 105, 113, 185, 65, 9,
17, 89, 225, 169, 177, 249, 129, 73, 81, 153,
33, 233, 241, 5
On 12/17/24 8:27 AM, Robin Dapp wrote:
Hi,
in PR117682 we build an interleaving pattern
{ 1, 201, 209, 25, 161, 105, 113, 185, 65, 9,
17, 89, 225, 169, 177, 249, 129, 73, 81, 153,
33, 233, 241, 57, 193, 137, 145, 217, 97, 41,
49, 121 };
with negative step expecting wraparo
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target riscv_v } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target rvv_zvl256b_ok } */
> +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gcv -mabi=lp64d -mrvv-vector-bits=zvl -fwrapv" }
> */
Ah, I forgot _zvl256b in the -march string. It seems to still fail with the
settings as posted but I'll st
Hi,
in PR117682 we build an interleaving pattern
{ 1, 201, 209, 25, 161, 105, 113, 185, 65, 9,
17, 89, 225, 169, 177, 249, 129, 73, 81, 153,
33, 233, 241, 57, 193, 137, 145, 217, 97, 41,
49, 121 };
with negative step expecting wraparound semantics due to -fwrapv.
For building inte
