g.e...@t-online.de>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] RX pragma address
Hi Oleg,
Thank you very much for those suggestions, they are definitely the better way
to go.
>From my point of view I would like drop both patches(RX and RL78) however I
>contacted the AP4 tool
t;; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RX pragma address
On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 12:12 +, Sebastian Perta wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Is this for some kind of legacy backwards compatibility of
> > > something?
> Sort of, this is required by the following tool
> ht
On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 12:12 +, Sebastian Perta wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Is this for some kind of legacy backwards compatibility of
> > > something?
> Sort of, this is required by the following tool
> https://www.renesas.com/en-eu/products/software-tools/tools/code-
>
m: Oleg Endo [mailto:oleg.e...@t-online.de]
Sent: 05 January 2018 11:59
To: Sebastian Perta <sebastian.pe...@renesas.com>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RX pragma address
Hi,
On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 11:03 +, Sebastian Perta wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The following patch adds
Hi,
On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 11:03 +, Sebastian Perta wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The following patch adds a new pragma, "pragma address" for RX.
> The patch updates extend.texi and add a test case to the regression
> as well.
> For the test case I checked than test is getting picked up in gcc.log
Sorry the spaces got removed from previous email.
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian Perta
Sent: 05 January 2018 10:59
To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org' <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH] RX pragma address
Hello,
The following patch adds a new pragma, "pragma addr
Hello,
The following patch adds a new pragma, "pragma address" for RX.
The patch updates extend.texi and add a test case to the regression as well.
For the test case I checked than test is getting picked up in gcc.log
unfortunately for the .texi part I don't know where to look/what to do to get
