On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Patrick Palka patr...@parcs.ath.cx writes:
At the same time this patch extends the coverage of the
-Wmisleading-indentation implementation to catch misleading indentation
involving the semicolon. (These
Patrick Palka patr...@parcs.ath.cx writes:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 2:11 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
void
warn_for_misleading_indentation (const common_token_info guard_tinfo,
const common_token_info body_tinfo,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 2:11 PM, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2015-06-07 at 16:06 -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
This patch refactors the entry point of -Wmisleading-indentation
Thanks for working on this. I was hoping to submit a patch to propose
putting
On Sun, 2015-06-07 at 16:06 -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
This patch refactors the entry point of -Wmisleading-indentation
Thanks for working on this. I was hoping to submit a patch to propose
putting -Wmisleading-indentation into -Wall, and have been testing the
warning on the linux kernel to
Patrick Palka patr...@parcs.ath.cx writes:
At the same time this patch extends the coverage of the
-Wmisleading-indentation implementation to catch misleading indentation
involving the semicolon. (These changes are all contained in
c-indentation.c.) For example, now we warn on the following
This patch refactors the entry point of -Wmisleading-indentation from:
void
warn_for_misleading_indentation (location_t guard_loc,
location_t body_loc,
location_t next_stmt_loc,
enum
The new heuristic turns out to trigger a common false positive (see test
case below) in many programs. I have applied this diff on top of the
original patch to make the heuristic more strict.
diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-indentation.c b/gcc/c-family/c-indentation.c
index d3e842b..5532ff4 100644
