Hi,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:23:00PM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
On IRC I've been told that is OK and the that CCP cannot make such
assumtions. Since it is only a missed-optimization if the call to the
builtin is not found and processed (basically PR 51491 again but only
in cases like
Please do that on the 4.7 branch as well if the assertion is incorrect.
Done.
Thanks. I've now reverted the kludge I put for Ada because of it:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-03/msg01616.html
--
Eric Botcazou
On IRC I've been told that is OK and the that CCP cannot make such
assumtions. Since it is only a missed-optimization if the call to the
builtin is not found and processed (basically PR 51491 again but only
in cases like these), I thought it best to just remove the assert by
the following
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
when testing a different patch of mine I hit the assert in
insert_clobbers_for_var which is there to make sure that there is a
call to builtin_stack_save in a BB with or dominating a call to
builtin_alloca_with_align. In my case that was not
Hi,
when testing a different patch of mine I hit the assert in
insert_clobbers_for_var which is there to make sure that there is a
call to builtin_stack_save in a BB with or dominating a call to
builtin_alloca_with_align. In my case that was not true because the
DOM pass duplicated the call to
