On Mon, 9 Oct 2023, Robin Dapp wrote:
> > Maybe I should pretend RVV support vect_pack/vect_unpack and enable
> > all the tests in target-supports.exp?
>
> The problem is that vect_pack/unpack is an overloaded term in the
> moment meaning "vector conversion" (promotion/demotion) or so. This
> te
] TEST: Fix dump FAIL of vect-multitypes-16.c for RVV
On Sun, 8 Oct 2023, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 10/8/23 05:35, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
> > RVV (RISC-V Vector) doesn't enable vect_unpack, but we still vectorize this
> > case well.
> > So, adjust dump chec
On Sun, 8 Oct 2023, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 10/8/23 05:35, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
> > RVV (RISC-V Vector) doesn't enable vect_unpack, but we still vectorize this
> > case well.
> > So, adjust dump check for RVV.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-multitypes-16.c: Fix dum
> Maybe I should pretend RVV support vect_pack/vect_unpack and enable
> all the tests in target-supports.exp?
The problem is that vect_pack/unpack is an overloaded term in the
moment meaning "vector conversion" (promotion/demotion) or so. This
test does not require pack/unpack for successful vect
No. They are not the same property.
Maybe I should pretend RVV support vect_pack/vect_unpack and enable all the
tests in target-supports.exp?
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Jeff Law
Date: 2023-10-08 23:09
To: Juzhe-Zhong; gcc-patches
CC: rguenther
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TEST: Fix dump FAIL of
On 10/8/23 05:35, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
RVV (RISC-V Vector) doesn't enable vect_unpack, but we still vectorize this
case well.
So, adjust dump check for RVV.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-multitypes-16.c: Fix dump FAIL of RVV.
I'd hoped to avoid a bunch of risc-v special
RVV (RISC-V Vector) doesn't enable vect_unpack, but we still vectorize this
case well.
So, adjust dump check for RVV.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-multitypes-16.c: Fix dump FAIL of RVV.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-multitypes-16.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insert
