On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Patrick
On 07/24/2016 11:56 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 9:13 PM, kugan
wrote:
On 23/07/16 05:26, Patrick Palka wrote:
This patch teaches VRP to register along a
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Patrick Palka wrote:
>> >
>> > > This patch teaches VRP to register along a default switch label
>> >
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Patrick Palka wrote:
> >
> > > This patch teaches VRP to register along a default switch label
> > > assertions that corresponds to the anti range of each case label.
> > >
> > >
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 9:13 PM, kugan
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 23/07/16 05:26, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch teaches VRP to register along a default switch label
>>> assertions
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 9:13 PM, kugan
wrote:
>
>
> On 23/07/16 05:26, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>
>> This patch teaches VRP to register along a default switch label
>> assertions that corresponds to the anti range of each case label.
>
>
> Hi Patrick,
>
> In case
On 23/07/16 05:26, Patrick Palka wrote:
This patch teaches VRP to register along a default switch label
assertions that corresponds to the anti range of each case label.
Hi Patrick,
In case of a larger switch statement with case values that cannot be
combined, you could end up with very
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> > This patch teaches VRP to register along a default switch label
> > assertions that corresponds to the anti range of each case label.
> >
> > Does this look OK to commit after bootstrap + regtest on
> >
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Patrick Palka wrote:
> This patch teaches VRP to register along a default switch label
> assertions that corresponds to the anti range of each case label.
>
> Does this look OK to commit after bootstrap + regtest on
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu?
Forgot the changelog:
This patch teaches VRP to register along a default switch label
assertions that corresponds to the anti range of each case label.
Does this look OK to commit after bootstrap + regtest on
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu?
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-6.c | 2 +-
10 matches
Mail list logo